References
Abdurahman, Suhaib, Alireza Salkhordeh Ziabari, Alexander K. Moore,
Daniel M. Bartels, and Morteza Dehghani. 2025. “A Primer for Evaluating Large Language Models in
Social-Science Research.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological
Science 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251325174.
Abraham, Louis, Charles Arnal, and Antoine Marie. 2025. “Prompt selection matters: enhancing text annotations for
social sciences with large language models.” Journal of Computational Social Science 8
(3): 73.
Acemoglu, Daron, and Pascual Restrepo. 2022. “Tasks, Automation, and the Rise in U.S. Wage
Inequality.” Econometrica 90 (5):
1973–2016. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta19815.
Acharya, Deepak Bhaskar, Karthigeyan Kuppan, and B. Divya. 2025.
“Agentic AI: Autonomous Intelligence for
Complex Goals–A Comprehensive Survey.” IEEE
Access 13: 18912–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3532853.
Aczel, Balazs et al. 2026. “Investigating the Analytical Robustness of the Social and
Behavioural Sciences.” Nature 652:
135–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09844-9.
Adcock, Robert, and David Collier. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative
and Quantitative Research.” American Political
Science Review 95 (3): 529–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055401003100.
Ahluwalia, Aman, and Suhrud Wani. 2024. Leveraging Large Language Models for Web
Scraping. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2406.08246.
Ahmed, Nur, and Muntasir Wahed. 2020. The
De-democratization of AI: Deep Learning and the Compute Divide in
Artificial Intelligence Research. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.15581.
Aigner, Ernest, Jacob Greenspon, and Dani Rodrik. 2025. “The global distribution of authorship in economics
journals.” World Development 189:
106926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106926.
Albertson, Bethany, and Shana Kushner Gadarian. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening
World. Cambridge University Press.
Alegria, Sharla. 2023. “Race and Intersecting
Inequalities in Machine Learning.” In The Oxford
Handbook of the Sociology of Machine Learning. Oxford University
Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197653609.013.23.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2003. The Meanings of
Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford University Press.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2015. “Measuring,
counting, interpreting: Our debate on methods continues.”
American Journal of Cultural
Sociology 3 (3): 309–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2015.13.
Alexander, Rohan. 2023. Telling Stories with
Data: With Applications in R and Python. Chapman &
Hall/CRC. https://tellingstorieswithdata.com/.
Alizadeh, Meysam, Maël Kubli, Zeynab Samei, et al. 2025. “Open-source LLMs for text annotation: a
practical guide for model setting and fine-tuning.”
Journal of Computational Social
Science 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00345-9.
Almaatouq, Abdullah, Mohammed Alsobay, Ming Yin, and Duncan J Watts.
2021. “Task complexity moderates group
synergy.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 118 (36): e2101062118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101062118.
Almaatouq, Abdullah, Joshua Aaron Becker, Michael Bernstein, et al.
2021. Scaling up experimental social,
behavioral, and economic science. December. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wksv8_v1.
Alvero, A. J., Dustin S. Stoltz, Oscar Stuhler, and Marshall A. Taylor.
2026. “Generative AI in Sociological
Research: State of the Discipline.” Sociological
Science 13 (January): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.15195/v13.a3.
Amano, Tatsuya, Valeria Ramı́rez-Castañeda, Violeta Berdejo-Espinola, et
al. 2023. “The manifold costs of being a
non-native English speaker in science.” PLOS
Biology 21 (7): e3002184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184.
American Economic Association. 2026. AER
Editorial Policy. American Economic Association. https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/aer/editorial-policy.
American Political Science Association. 2026. Statement on the proposed elimination of the social,
behavioral, and economic sciences directorate at the National Science
Foundation. https://apsanet.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/FINAL-Dissolution-of-SBE.pdf.
American Political Science Review. 2026. Preparing Your
Materials. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/information/author-instructions/preparing-your-materials.
Amershi, Saleema, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, et al. 2019. Guidelines for Human-AI
Interaction. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233.
Andrews, Isaiah, and Maximilian Kasy. 2019. “Identification of and Correction for Publication
Bias.” American Economic Review 109
(8): 2766–94. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180310.
Anthropic. 2024. Golden Gate Claude. https://www.anthropic.com/news/golden-gate-claude.
Anthropic. 2026a. “Prompt Engineering
Overview.” Anthropic. https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/overview.
Anthropic. 2026b. System Card: Claude Mythos
Preview. https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/7624816413e9b4d2e3ba620c5a5e091b98b190a5.pdf.
Arel-Bundock, Vincent, Ryan C. Briggs, Hristos Doucouliagos, Marco
Mendoza Aviña, and T. D. Stanley. 2026. “Quantitative Political Science Research is Greatly
Underpowered.” Journal of
Politics 88 (1): 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1086/734279.
Argyle, Lisa P, Christopher A Bail, Ethan C Busby, et al. 2023a.
“Leveraging AI for democratic discourse: Chat
interventions can improve online political conversations at
scale.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 120 (41): e2311627120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2311627120.
Argyle, Lisa P., Ethan C. Busby, Nancy Fulda, Joshua R. Gubler,
Christopher Rytting, and David Wingate. 2023b. “Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human
Samples.” Political Analysis 31 (3): 337–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2023.2.
Argyle, Lisa P., Ethan C. Busby, Joshua R. Gubler, Alex Lyman, et al.
2025. “Testing theories of political
persuasion using AI.” Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (18). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2412815122.
Argyle, Lisa P., Ethan C. Busby, Joshua R. Gubler, Bryce Hepner, Alex
Lyman, and David Wingate. 2025. “Arti-‘fickle’ intelligence: using LLMs as a
tool for inference in the political and social sciences.”
Nature Computational Science 5: 737–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-025-00843-4.
Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao, Jinghuan Ma, Ting Chen,
et al. 2025. “Generative
AI and Academic Scientists in US Universities:
Perception, Experience, and Adoption
Intentions.” PLOS ONE 20 (8):
e0330416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330416.
Arseniev-Koehler, Alina, and Jacob G. Foster. 2022. “Machine Learning as a Model for Cultural Learning:
Teaching an Algorithm What it Means to be Fat.”
Sociological Methods & Research 51 (4):
1484–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221122603.
Ashwin, Julian, Aditya Chhabra, and Vijayendra Rao. 2025. “Using Large Language Models for Qualitative Analysis Can
Introduce Serious Bias.” Sociological Methods
& Research, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251338246.
Assad, Stephanie, Robert Clark, Daniel Ershov, and Lei Xu. 2024.
“Algorithmic Pricing and Competition:
Empirical Evidence from the German Retail Gasoline
Market.” Journal of Political
Economy 132 (3): 723–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/726906.
Atreja, Shubham, Joshua Ashkinaze, Lingyao Li, Julia Mendelsohn, and
Libby Hemphill. 2025. “What’s in a Prompt?: A
Large-Scale Experiment to Assess the Impact of Prompt Design on the
Compliance and Accuracy of LLM-Generated Text
Annotations.” Proceedings of the International AAAI
Conference on Web and Social Media 19: 122–45. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35807.
Attewell, Paul. 2001. “Comment: The First and
Second Digital Divides.” Sociology of Education 74 (3): 252–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277.
Autor, D. H., F. Levy, and R. J. Murnane. 2003. “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An
Empirical Exploration.” The
Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1279–333. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801.
Autor, David H., Lawrence F. Katz, and Melissa S. Kearney. 2008.
“Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the
Revisionists.” Review of
Economics and Statistics 90 (2): 300–323. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.2.300.
Bail, Christopher A. 2014. “The cultural
environment: measuring culture with big data.” Theory and Society 43 (3-4): 465–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9216-5.
Bail, Christopher A. 2024. “Can Generative AI
Improve Social Science?” Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 121 (21): e2314021121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314021121.
Barari, Soubhik, and Tyler Simko. 2023. “LocalView, a database of public meetings for the study of
local politics and policy-making in the United States.”
Scientific Data 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02044-y.
Barrie, Christopher, and Roberto Cerina. 2026. Synthetic personas distort the structure of human belief
systems. February. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/n7fq8_v1.
Barrie, Christopher, Elli Palaiologou, and Petter Törnberg. 2025.
Prompt Stability Scoring for Text Annotation
with Large Language Models. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.02039.
Barrie, Christopher, Alexis Palmer, and Arthur Spirling. 2025.
“Replication for Language Models: Problems,
Principles, and Best Practices for Political Science.” https://arthurspirling.org/documents/BarriePalmerSpirling_TrustMeBro.pdf.
Bastani, Hamsa, Osbert Bastani, Alp Sungu, Haosen Ge, Özge Kabakcı, and
Rei Mariman. 2025. “Generative
AI without Guardrails Can Harm Learning:
Evidence from High School Mathematics.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (26):
e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122.
Baumann, Joachim, Jiaxin Pei, Sanmi Koyejo, and Dirk Hovy. 2026.
Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous
Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.03202.
Baumann, Joachim, Paul Röttger, Aleksandra Urman, et al. 2025. Large Language Model Hacking: Quantifying the Hidden
Risks of Using LLMs for Text Annotation. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.08825.
Bazazi, Sepideh, Jurgis Karpus, and Taha Yasseri. 2025. “AI’s assigned gender affects human-AI
cooperation.” iScience 28 (12): 113905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113905.
Beaman, Jean. 2015. “Boundaries of
Frenchness: cultural citizenship and France’s middle-class North African
second-generation.” Identities 22
(1): 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289x.2014.931235.
Beatty, Sally. 2024. “Khan
Academy and Microsoft Partner to Expand Access
to AI Tools That Personalize Teaching and Help Make
Learning Fun.” Microsoft Source, May 21. https://web.archive.org/web/20250325224614/https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/ai/khan-academy-and-microsoft-partner-to-expand-access-to-ai-tools/.
Beauvoir, Simone de. [1949] 2011. The Second Sex.
Vintage.
Bendor, Jonathan. 1995. “A Model of Muddling
Through.” American Political Science
Review 89 (4): 819–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082511.
Bendor, Jonathan. 2010. Bounded rationality and
politics. University of California Press.
Bendor, Jonathan. 2015. “Incrementalism: Dead
yet Flourishing.” Public Administration
Review 75 (2): 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12333.
Benjamini, Yoav, and Yosef Hochberg. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and
Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B
(Methodological) 57 (1): 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
Bennett, Sue, Karl Maton, and Lisa Kervin. 2008. “The ’digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the
evidence.” British Journal of
Educational Technology 39 (5): 775–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x.
Besiroglu, Tamay, Sage Andrus Bergerson, Amelia Michael, Lennart Heim,
Xueyun Luo, and Neil Thompson. 2024. The
Compute Divide in Machine Learning: A Threat to Academic Contribution
and Scrutiny? https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02452.
Bianchini, Stefano, Moritz Müller, and Pierre Pelletier. 2025.
“Drivers and Barriers of AI
Adoption and Use in Scientific Research.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change
220: 124303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124303.
Bisbee, James, Joshua D. Clinton, Cassy Dorff, Brenton Kenkel, and
Jennifer M. Larson. 2024. “Synthetic
Replacements for Human Survey Data? The Perils of Large Language
Models.” Political Analysis 32 (4):
401–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2024.5.
Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon, and Robert A. Bjork. 2011. “Making Things Hard on Yourself, but in a Good Way:
Creating Desirable Difficulties to Enhance
Learning.” In Psychology and the Real World:
Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to
Society, edited by Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Richard W. Pew, Leaetta
M. Hough, and James R. Pomerantz. Worth Publishers.
Bjork, Robert A. 1975. “Retrieval as a Memory
Modifier.” In Information Processing and Cognition:
The Loyola Symposium, edited by Robert L. Solso.
Erlbaum.
Blair, J. C., R. S. Ryan, and L. A. Schutzenhofer. 2012. Elements of Engineering Excellence.
NASA/CR—2012-217471. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20130000445/downloads/20130000445.pdf.
Block, Ray, Charles Crabtree, John B. Holbein, and J. Quin Monson. 2021.
“Are Americans less likely to reply to emails
from Black people relative to White people?” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 118 (52). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110347118.
Boelaert, Julien, Samuel Coavoux, Étienne Ollion, Ivaylo Petev, and
Patrick Präg. 2024. Machine Bias. Generative
Large Language Models Have a View of Their Own. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/r2pnb.
Boelaert, Julien, Samuel Coavoux, Étienne Ollion, Ivaylo Petev, and
Patrick Präg. 2025. “Machine Bias. How Do Generative
Language Models Answer Opinion Polls?”
Sociological Methods & Research 54 (3):
1156–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251330582.
Bol, Thijs, Mathijs de Vaan, and Arnout van de Rijt. 2018. “The Matthew effect in science funding.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 115 (19): 4887–90. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115.
Bolukbasi, Tolga, Kai-Wei Chang, James Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and
Adam Kalai. 2016. Man is to Computer Programmer
as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06520.
Bonikowski, Bart, Yuchen Luo, and Oscar Stuhler. 2022. “Politics as Usual? Measuring Populism, Nationalism, and
Authoritarianism in U.S. Presidential Campaigns (1952–2020) with Neural
Language Models.” Sociological Methods &
Research 51 (4): 1721–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221122317.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social
Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Translated by Richard
Nice. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Social
Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the
Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson. Greenwood
Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2008. Practical Reason: On
the Theory of Action. Polity Press.
Boutyline, Andrei, and Alina Arseniev-Koehler. 2025. “Meaning in Hyperspace: Word Embeddings as Tools for
Cultural Measurement.” Annual
Review of Sociology 51 (1): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090324-024027.
Boutyline, Andrei, Alina Arseniev-Koehler, and Devin J Cornell. 2023.
“School, Studying, and Smarts: Gender
Stereotypes and Education Across 80 Years of American Print Media,
1930–2009.” Social Forces 102 (1):
263–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soac148.
Boykis, Vicki. 2026a. “Build Yourself
Flowers.” April 20. https://web.archive.org/web/20260426035611/https://vickiboykis.com/2026/04/20/build-yourself-flowers/.
Boykis, Vicki. 2026b. “NASA
Elements of Engineering Excellence.” April 5. https://web.archive.org/web/20260430181213/https://vickiboykis.com/2026/04/05/nasa-elements-of-engineering-excellence/.
Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labor and monopoly
capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century.
Monthly Review Press.
Breznau, Nate, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke,
et al. 2022. “Observing Many
Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe
of Uncertainty.” Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences 119 (44): e2203150119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203150119.
Briggs, Ryan C., Jonathan Mellon, and Vincent Arel-Bundock. 2026.
“It Must Be Very Hard to Publish Null
Results.” https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/zr5vf_v1.
Brodeur, Abel, and Bruno Barbarioli. 2025. The
Replication Engine: How to Build Automated Replication Infrastructure
for Better, Faster Science. Institute for Progress. https://ifp.org/the-replication-engine/.
Brodeur, Abel, Nikolai Cook, and Anthony Heyes. 2020. “Methods Matter: P-Hacking and Publication Bias in Causal
Analysis in Economics.” American Economic
Review 110 (11): 3634–60. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190687.
Brodeur, Abel, Nikolai Cook, and Carina Neisser. 2024. “p-Hacking, Data type and Data-Sharing
Policy.” The Economic Journal 134
(659): 985–1018. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead104.
Brodeur, Abel, Mathias Lé, Marc Sangnier, and Yanos Zylberberg. 2016.
“Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back.”
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8
(1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150044.
Brodeur, Abel, David Valenta, Alexandru Marcoci, et
al. 2025. Comparing Human-Only,
AI-Assisted, and AI-Led Teams on Assessing Research Reproducibility in
Quantitative Social Science. I4R Discussion Paper Series. https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/17645/comparing-human-only-ai-assisted-and-ai-led-teams-on-assessing-research-reproducibility-in-quantitative-social-science.
Brooks, Jr., Frederick P. 1995. The Mythical
Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering Anniversary
Edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Brown, Megan A., Shubham Atreja, Libby Hemphill, and Patrick Y. Wu.
2025. Evaluating how LLM annotations represent
diverse views on contentious topics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23243.
Bryan, Jenny. 2018. “Code Smells
and Feels.” userR!2018, Brisbane, July. https://github.com/jennybc/code-smells-and-feels.
Brynjolfsson, Erik, Bharat Chandar, and Ruyu Chen. 2025. Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent
Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford
Digital Economy Lab. https://digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/publications/canaries-in-the-coal-mine/.
Butler, Daniel M., and Charles Crabtree. 2017. “Moving Beyond Measurement: Adapting Audit Studies to Test
Bias-Reducing Interventions.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 4
(1): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2017.11.
Calvano, Emilio, Giacomo Calzolari, Vincenzo Denicolò, and Sergio
Pastorello. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence,
Algorithmic Pricing, and Collusion.” American
Economic Review 110 (10): 3267–97. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190623.
Camerer, Colin F., Anna Dreber, Eskil Forsell, et al. 2016. “Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in
Economics.” Science 351 (6280):
1433–36. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918.
Cameron, William Bruce. 1963. Informal
sociology a casual introduction to sociological thinking.
Random House.
Campbell, Donald T. 1979. “Assessing the
impact of planned social change.” Evaluation and Program Planning 2 (1): 67–90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X.
Carammia, Marcello, Stefano Maria Iacus, and Giuseppe Porro. 2024.
Rethinking Scale: The Efficacy of Fine-Tuned
Open-Source LLMs in Large-Scale Reproducible Social Science
Research. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00890.
Carbon Credits. 2026. NVIDIA Controls 92% of
the GPU Market in 2025 and Reveals Next Gen AI
Supercomputer. https://carboncredits.com/nvidia-controls-92-of-the-gpu-market-in-2025-and-reveals-next-gen-ai-supercomputer/.
Carley, Kathleen. 1994. “Extracting culture
through textual analysis.” Poetics
22 (4): 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)90011-6.
Carlini, Nicholas, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee,
Florian Tramer, and Chiyuan Zhang. 2023. “Quantifying
Memorization Across Neural Language Models.” The
Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=TatRHT_1cK.
Carlson, Natalie A., and Vanessa Burbano. 2026. “The Use of LLMs to Annotate Data in Management Research:
Foundational Guidelines and Warnings.” Strategic
Management Journal, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70023.
Chen, Lingjiao, Matei Zaharia, and James Zou. 2024. “How Is ChatGPT’s Behavior Changing over
Time?” Harvard Data Science Review,
ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.5317da47.
Cheng, Joe, and Sara Altman. 2025. “Databot
Is Not a Flotation Device.” Posit, August 25. https://web.archive.org/web/20250910084327/https://posit.co/blog/databot-is-not-a-flotation-device/.
Chiang, Ted. 2024. “Why
A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art.”
The New Yorker, August 31. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art.
Chiang, Wei-Lin, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, et al. 2024. Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by
Human Preference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04132.
Chugunova, Marina, Dietmar Harhoff, Katharina Hölzle, et al. 2026.
“Who Uses AI in Research, and
for What? Large-scale Survey Evidence from
Germany.” Research Policy 55 (2):
105381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105381.
Chugunova, Marina, and Daniela Sele. 2022. “We and It: An interdisciplinary review of the
experimental evidence on how humans interact with
machines.” Journal of Behavioral
and Experimental Economics 99: 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2022.101897.
Clifford, Scott, and Spencer Piston. 2017. “Explaining Public Support for Counterproductive
Homelessness Policy: The Role of Disgust.”
Political Behavior 39 (2): 503–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9366-4.
Cochrane, Christopher, Michael Cowan, Christopher Greenaway, and Rohan
Alexander. 2026. “The Qualitative Turn in
Quantitative Methods.” Unpublished manuscript.
Cockburn, Alistair. 2005. “Hexagonal
Architecture.” https://alistair.cockburn.us/hexagonal-architecture/.
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist
Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of
Empowerment. 2nd ed. Routledge.
Coppock, Alexander, Seth J Hill, and Lynn Vavreck. 2020. “The small effects of political advertising are small
regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: Evidence from 59
real-time randomized experiments.” Science
Advances 6 (36): eabc4046. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc4046.
Correll, Shelley J. 2001. “Gender and the
Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased
Self-Assessments.” American
Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 1691–730. https://doi.org/10.1086/321299.
Correll, Shelley J. 2004. “Constraints into
Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career
Aspirations.” American Sociological
Review 69 (1): 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900106.
Correll, Shelley J., and Cecilia L. Ridgeway. 2006.
“Expectation States Theory.” In Handbook
of Social Psychology, edited by John Delamater. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-x_2.
Corrigan, Jack, Ngor Luong, and Christian Schoeberl. 2024. Acquiring AI Companies: Tracking U.S. AI Mergers and
Acquisitions. https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/acquiring-ai-companies-tracking-u-s-ai-mergers-and-acquisitions/.
Costello, Thomas H., Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2024.
“Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through
dialogues with AI.” Science 385
(6714). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq1814.
Cox, Emily, Fiona Shirani, and Paul Rouse. 2024. “Voices from the Algorithm: Large Language Models in
Social Research.” Energy Research & Social
Science 113: 103559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103559.
Crabtree, Charles, John Holbein, Mitchell Bosley, and Semra Sevi. 2025.
Can AI Help Reduce Prejudice? Evaluating the
Effectiveness of AI-Powered Personalized Persuasion on Support for
Transgender Rights. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5229084.
Criddle, Cristina. 2024. “Character.ai
abandons making AI models after $2.7bn Google
deal.” In Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/f2a9b5d4-05fe-4134-b4fe-c24727b85bba.
Cruces, Guillermo, Diego Fernández Meijide, Sebastian Galiani, Ramiro H.
Gálvez, and María Lombardi. 2026. Does
Generative AI Narrow Education-Based Productivity Gaps?
Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. No.
34851. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w34851.
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. “The behavioral
approach in political science: Epitaph for a monument to a successful
protest.” American Political Science
Review 55 (4): 763–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952525.
Dannefer, D. 2003. “Cumulative
Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course: Cross-Fertilizing Age and
Social Science Theory.” The
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social
Sciences 58 (6): S327–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.s327.
Danús, Lluı́s, William Dinneen, Carolina Torreblanca, Guy Grossman, and
Sandra González-Bailón. 2026. “Informal
connections outweigh coauthorship ties in academic
impact.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 123 (18): e2511050123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2511050123.
Darling, Kate. 2021. The New Breed: What Our
History with Animals Reveals About Our Future with Robots.
Henry Holt & Co.
Davidovic, Jovana. 2023. “On the Purpose of
Meaningful Human Control of AI.” Frontiers in Big Data 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.1017677.
Davidson, Thomas. 2024. “Start Generating:
Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sociological
Research.” Socius: Sociological
Research for a Dynamic World 10 (January):
23780231241259651. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241259651.
Davidson, Thomas, and Daniel Karell. 2025. “Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence into
Social Science Research: Measurement, Prompting, and
Simulation.” Sociological Methods &
Research 54 (3): 775–93. https://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/W7ZYSTDICBC6JQGTTTGM/full.
Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). 2012. San Francisco Declaration on Research
Assessment. https://sfdora.org/read/.
Dell’Acqua, Fabrizio, Edward McFowland, Ethan Mollick, et al. 2026.
“Navigating the Jagged Technological
Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of Artificial
Intelligence on Knowledge Worker Productivity and
Quality.” Organization Science 37
(2): 403–23. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.21838.
Della Rocca, Michael. 2025. “Infinite Regress
Arguments.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy, Fall 2025, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman.
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/infinite-regress/.
DeMello, Margo. 2012. Animals and Society: An
Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. Columbia University
Press.
Deursen, Alexander J. A. M. van, and Ellen J. Helsper. 2015.
“The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits
Most from Being Online?” In Communication and
Information Technologies Annual. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/s2050-206020150000010002.
Deursen, Alexander van, and Jan van Dijk. 2019. “The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities
in physical access to inequalities in material access.”
New Media & Society 21 (2): 354–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082.
Devlin, Jacob, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019.
“BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional
Transformers for Language Understanding.” Proceedings
of the 2019 Conference of the North, 4171–86. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1423.
Di Tillio, Alfredo, Marco Ottaviani, and Peter Norman Sørensen. 2021.
“Strategic Sample Selection.”
Econometrica 89 (2): 911–53. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17288.
Dijk, Jan A. G. M. van. 2005. The Deepening
Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. SAGE
Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812.
Dijk, Jan A. G. M. van. 2006. “Digital divide
research, achievements and shortcomings.”
Poetics 34 (4-5): 221–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004.
DiMaggio, Paul. 1987. “Classification in
Art.” American Sociological Review
52 (4): 440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095290.
DiMaggio, Paul. 1997. “Culture and
Cognition.” Annual Review of
Sociology 23 (1): 263–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263.
DiMaggio, Paul, and Eszter Hargittai. 2001. From the “Digital Divide” to “Digital
Inequality”: Studying Internet Use as Penetration
Increases. Working Papers No. 47. Princeton University,
School of Public; International Affairs, Center for Arts; Cultural
Policy Studies. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/cpanda/15.html.
DiMaggio, Paul, Eszter Hargittai, Coral Celeste, and Steven Shafer.
2004. “Digital Inequality: From unequal
access to differentiated use.” In Social
Inequality, edited by Kathryn Neckerman. Russell Sage Foundation.
DiMaggio, Paul, Manish Nag, and David Blei. 2013. “Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the
sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage
of U.S. government arts funding.”
Poetics 41 (6): 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004.
DiPrete, Thomas A., and Gregory M. Eirich. 2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A
Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.”
Annual Review of Sociology 32 (1):
271–97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127.
Dittmar, Jeremiah E. 2011. “Information
Technology and Economic Change: The Impact of The Printing
Press.” The Quarterly Journal of
Economics 126 (3): 1133–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr035.
Du Bois, W. E. B. [1903] 1994. The Souls of
Black Folk. Dover.
Eaton, Asia A., Jessica F. Saunders, Ryan K. Jacobson, and Keon West.
2020. “How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact
the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of
Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates.”
Sex Roles 82 (3-4): 127–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w.
Egami, Naoki, Musashi Hinck, Brandon M. Stewart, and Hanying Wei. 2026.
“Using Large Language Model Annotations for
the Social Sciences: A General Framework of Using Predicted Variables in
Downstream Analyses.” American
Journal of Political Science.
Ellington, Aimee J. 2003. “A Meta-Analysis of
the Effects of Calculators on Students’ Achievement and Attitude Levels
in Precollege Mathematics Classes.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
34 (5): 433. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034795.
Engzell, Per, and Nathan Wilmers. 2026. The Paper
Factory. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/24xfq_v1.
Evans, Eric. 2004. Domain-Driven Design:
Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software. Addison-Wesley
Professional.
Fan, Yizhou, Luzhen Tang, Huixiao Le, et al. 2025. “Beware of Metacognitive Laziness: Effects of
Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Motivation, Processes,
and Performance.” British Journal
of Educational Technology, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544.
Fanon, Frantz. 2008. Black Skin, White Masks.
Grove Press.
Filimonovic, Dragan, Christian Rutzer, and Conny Wunsch. 2025. Can GenAI Improve Academic Performance? Evidence from the
Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02408.
Fish, Sara, Yannai A. Gonczarowski, and Ran I. Shorrer. 2026. Algorithmic Collusion by Large Language
Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00806.
Fishman, Nic, and Gabriel Sekeres. 2026. “Editorial Screening when Science is Cheap.”
Working paper. https://njw.fish/static/papers/agentic_specification.pdf.
Fontana, Nicolò, Francesco Pierri, and Luca Maria Aiello. 2025.
“Nicer than Humans: How Do Large Language
Models Behave in the Prisoner’s Dilemma?” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web
and Social Media 19: 522–35. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35829.
Foster, Jacob G. 2018. “Culture and
computation: Steps to a Probably Approximately Correct theory of
culture.” Poetics 68: 144–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.04.007.
Franco, Annie, Neil Malhotra, and Gabor Simonovits. 2014. “Publication Bias in the Social Sciences: Unlocking the
File Drawer.” Science 345 (6203):
1502–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484.
Frankel, Alexander, and Maximilian Kasy. 2022. “Which
Findings Should Be Published?” American Economic
Journal: Microeconomics 14 (1): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20190133.
Gaddis, S. Michael, Evan N. Larsen, Charles Crabtree, and John B.
Holbein. 2022. Discrimination against Black and
Hispanic Americans is highest in hiring and housing contexts: A
meta-analysis of correspondence audits. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3975770.
Gai, Phyliss Jia, Jiayi Hou, and Yanping Tu. 2025. Competence Penalty Is a Barrier to the Adoption of New
Technology. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5255039.
Gallegos, Isabel O., Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, et al. 2024.
“Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models:
A Survey.” Computational Linguistics
(Cambridge, MA) 50 (3): 1097–179. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00524.
Gao, Jian, and Dashun Wang. 2024. “Quantifying the use and potential benefits of artificial
intelligence in scientific research.” Nature
Human Behaviour 8 (12): 2281–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02020-5.
Gebru, Timnit, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, et al. 2021.
“Datasheets for datasets.”
Communications of the ACM 64 (12):
86–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723.
Geertz, Clifford. 2009. The Interpretation of
Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books.
Geiecke, Friedrich, and Xavier Jaravel. 2024. Conversations at Scale: Robust AI-led Interviews with a
Simple Open-Source Platform. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4974382.
Gelman, Andrew, and Eric Loken. 2013. “The
Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even
When There Is No ‘Fishing Expedition’ or
‘P-Hacking’ and the Research Hypothesis Was Posited Ahead
of Time.” https://sites.stat.columbia.edu/gelman/research/unpublished/p_hacking.pdf.
Gelman, Andrew, and Eric Loken. 2014. “The
Statistical Crisis in Science.” American
Scientist 102 (6): 460–65. https://doi.org/10.1511/2014.111.460.
Gerring, John. 1999. “What Makes a Concept
Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the
Social Sciences.” Polity 31 (3):
357–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235246.
Gonzalez-Rostani, Valentina, and Shir Raviv. 2026. Tracing AI Assistance and AI Agents in Survey
Research. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6576218.
Google Cloud. 2026. “What Is Prompt
Engineering?” Google Cloud. https://cloud.google.com/discover/what-is-prompt-engineering.
Gordon, Sanford C., Cyrus Samii, and Zhihao Su. 2025. Data-NoMAD: A Tool for Boosting Confidence
in the Integrity of Social Science Survey Data. arXiv
preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.14651.
Greengard, Samuel. 2025. “The AI Deskilling
Paradox.” Communications of the ACM,
November 7. https://web.archive.org/web/20251110043905/https://cacm.acm.org/news/the-ai-deskilling-paradox/.
Grimmer, Justin, Margaret E. Roberts, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2022.
Text as data: A new framework for machine
learning and the social sciences. Princeton University
Press.
Grimmer, Justin, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic
Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.”
Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028.
Griswold, Wendy. 1987. “The Fabrication of
Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britain,
and the West Indies.” American
Journal of Sociology 92 (5): 1077–117. https://doi.org/10.1086/228628.
Grossman, Sanford J. 1981. “The Informational
Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure About Product
Quality.” Journal of Law and
Economics 24 (3): 461–83. https://doi.org/10.1086/467025.
Grossmann, Igor, Matthew Feinberg, Dawn C Parker, Nicholas A Christakis,
Philip E Tetlock, and William A Cunningham. 2023. “AI and the transformation of social science
research.” Science 380 (6650):
1108–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1778.
Guo, Daya, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, et al. 2025. “DeepSeek-R1 incentivizes reasoning in
LLMs through reinforcement learning.”
Nature 645 (8081): 633–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z.
Hall, Andy. 2026a. “AI is
already 10x-ing academic research. How do we get to 100x?”
Substack Newsletter. In The Roots of
Progress. https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/ai-is-already-10x-ing-academic-research.
Hall, Andy. 2026b. “The 100x Research
Institution.” Substack Newsletter. In Free
Systems. https://freesystems.substack.com/p/the-100x-research-institution.
Halterman, Andrew, and Katherine A. Keith. 2026. “Codebook LLMs: Evaluating LLMs as Measurement Tools for
Political Science Concepts.” Political
Analysis 34 (2): 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2025.10017.
Handa, Kunal, Alex Tamkin, Miles McCain, et al. 2025. Which Economic Tasks Are Performed with AI? Evidence from
Millions of Claude Conversations. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.04761.
Hanson, Mark A, Pablo Gómez Barreiro, Paolo Crosetto, and Dan
Brockington. 2024. “The strain on scientific
publishing.” Quantitative Science
Studies 5 (4): 823–43. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327.
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges:
The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial
Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14
(3): 575. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
Hardinges, Jack, Elena Simperl, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2024. “We Must Fix the Lack of Transparency Around the Data Used
to Train Foundation Models.” Harvard Data
Science Review, nos. Special Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.a50ec6e6.
Hargittai, Eszter. 2002. “Second-Level
Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills.”
First Monday 7 (4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942.
Hawking, Stephen. 1996. The illustrated a brief
history of time: Updated and expanded edition. Bantam.
He, Yongyuan, and Yi Bu. 2026. “Academic
Journals’ AI Policies Fail to Curb the Surge in AI-assisted Academic Writing.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123 (9):
e2526734123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2526734123.
Heath, Anthony, Stephen Fisher, and Shawna Smith. 2005. “The
Globalization Of Public Opinion Research.” Annual Review of Political Science 8 (1):
297–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.090203.103000.
Hembree, Ray, and Donald J. Dessart. 1986. “Effects of Hand-Held Calculators in Precollege
Mathematics Education: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
17 (2): 83. https://doi.org/10.2307/749255.
Henry, Emeric. 2009. “Strategic Disclosure of
Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty.”
The Economic Journal 119 (539): 1036–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02265.x.
Henry, Emeric, and Marco Ottaviani. 2019. “Research and the Approval Process: The Organization of
Persuasion.” American Economic
Review 109 (3): 911–55. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171919.
Henshall, Will. 2024. “There’s an AI Lobbying
Frenzy in Washington. Big Tech Is Dominating.” In
Time. https://time.com/6972134/ai-lobbying-tech-policy-surge/.
Herresthal, Claudia. 2022. “Hidden Testing
and Selective Disclosure of Evidence.” Journal of Economic Theory 200: 105312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2021.105312.
Hicks, Cat. 2026a. Learning Goal: A
Claude Code Skill for Structured Goal Setting with Mental
Contrasting. Released April 21. https://github.com/DrCatHicks/learning-goal.
Hicks, Cat. 2026b. Learning Opportunities:
A Claude Code Skill for Deliberate Skill
Development. Released April 22. https://github.com/DrCatHicks/learning-opportunities.
Hicks, Diana, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, and Ismael
Rafols. 2015. “Bibliometrics: The Leiden
Manifesto for research metrics.”
Nature 520 (7548): 429–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a.
Holst, Dirk, Keno Moenck, Julian Koch, Ole Schmedemann, and Thorsten
Schüppstuhl. 2025. “Transparent Reporting of
AI in Systematic Literature Reviews:
Development of the PRISMA-trAIce Checklist.”
JMIR AI, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.2196/80247.
Horton, John J., Apostolos Filippas, and Benjamin S. Manning. 2026.
Large Language Models as Simulated Economic
Agents: What Can We Learn from Homo Silicus? https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07543.
Hosseini, Soodeh, and Hossein Seilani. 2025. “The role of agentic AI in shaping a smart future: A
systematic review.” Array 26:
100399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.100399.
Houghton, James P., and Duncan J Watts. 2025. The role of topic choice in cross-partisan
conversations. May. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nygt3\_v1.
Huang, Lei, Weijiang Yu, Weitao Ma, et al. 2025. “A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models:
Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions.”
ACM Transactions on Information
Systems 43 (2): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3703155.
Huh, Minyoung, Brian Cheung, Tongzhou Wang, and Phillip Isola. 2024a.
“Position: The Platonic Representation
Hypothesis.” In Proceedings of the 41st International
Conference on Machine Learning, edited by Ruslan Salakhutdinov,
Zico Kolter, Katherine Heller, et al., vol. 235. Proceedings of Machine
Learning Research. PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/huh24a.html.
Huh, Minyoung, Brian Cheung, Tongzhou Wang, and Phillip Isola. 2024b.
The Platonic Representation Hypothesis. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2405.07987.
Humlum, Anders, and Emilie Vestergaard. 2024. “The unequal adoption of ChatGPT exacerbates existing
inequalities among workers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 122 (1). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2414972121.
Imas, Alex, and Soumitra Shukla. 2026. “How
Will AI-driven Automation Actually Affect Jobs?: The Economics of
AI Exposure and Job Displacement.” March 23. https://aleximas.substack.com/p/how-will-ai-driven-automation-actually.
Ioannidis, John P. A. 2005. “Why Most Published Research
Findings Are False.” PLOS Medicine 2
(8): e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on
polarization.” Public Opinion
Quarterly 76 (3): 405–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038.
Jensen, Jeffrey L., Daniel Karell, Cole Tanigawa-Lau, Nizar Habash, Mai
Oudah, and Dhia Fairus Shofia Fani. 2022. “Language Models in Sociological Research: An Application
to Classifying Large Administrative Data and Measuring
Religiosity.” Sociological
Methodology 52 (1): 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/00811750211053370.
Jepperson, Ronald L., and Ann Swidler. 1994. “What properties of culture should we
measure?” Poetics 22 (4): 359–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)90014-0.
Jin, Berber. 2025. “Anthropic is on track to
turn a profit much faster than OpenAI.” The Wall
Street Journal, November 10. https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-anthropic-profitability-e9f5bcd6.
Johnston, Theresa. 2015. Jonathan Bendor: Why
Criticism Is Good for Innovation. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/jonathan-bendor-why-criticism-good-innovation.
Jošt, Gregor, Viktor Taneski, and Sašo Karakatič. 2024. “The impact of large language models on programming
education and student learning outcomes.”
Applied Sciences 14 (10): 4115. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14104115.
Joyce, Kelly, Laurel Smith-Doerr, Sharla Alegria, et al. 2021.
“Toward a Sociology of Artificial
Intelligence: A Call for Research on Inequalities and Structural
Change.” Socius: Sociological
Research for a Dynamic World 7 (January). https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023121999581.
Juavinett, Ashley. 2026. “How to Teach
Programming in the Age of AI.” The
Transmitter, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.53053/IXOZ2506.
Juavinett, Ashley, and Cat Hicks. 2026. You Can
Learn with AI. Season 2, episode 4, February
16. https://www.buzzsprout.com/2396236/episodes/18692591-you-can-learn-with-ai.
Kaiser, Tamás, Tamás Tóth, and Marton Demeter. 2023. “Publishing Trends in Political Science: How Publishing
Houses, Geographical Positions, and International Collaboration Shapes
Academic Knowledge Production.” Publishing
Research Quarterly 39 (3): 201–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-023-09957-x.
Kamenica, Emir, and Matthew Gentzkow. 2011. “Bayesian
Persuasion.” American Economic
Review 101 (6): 2590–615. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2590.
Kane, John V. 2025. “More than meets the ITT:
A guide for anticipating and investigating nonsignificant results in
survey experiments.” Journal of
Experimental Political Science 12 (1): 110–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2024.1.
Karjus, Andres. 2025. “Machine-assisted
quantitizing designs: augmenting humanities and social sciences with
artificial intelligence.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
12 (1): 1–18.
Kasy, Maximilian. 2021. “Of Forking Paths and
Tied Hands: Selective Publication of Findings, and What Economists
Should Do about It.” Journal of
Economic Perspectives 35 (3): 175–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.3.175.
Kasy, Maximilian, and Jann Spiess. 2025. “Optimal Pre-Analysis Plans: Statistical Decisions Subject
to Implementability.” Working
paper. https://maxkasy.github.io/home/files/papers/optimal_preanalysis_plans.pdf.
Kazimirov, Alexandros. 2025. Mergers & Cooptive
Acquisitions. https://www.antitrustinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/AAI-Paper-Mergers-Cooptive-Acquisitions.pdf.
Kellogg, Katherine C., Melissa A. Valentine, and Angéle Christin. 2020.
“Algorithms at Work: The New Contested
Terrain of Control.” Academy of
Management Annals 14 (1): 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174.
Khan, Farhan Kamrul, Hazem Ibrahim, Nouar Aldahoul, Talal Rahwan, and
Yasir Zaki. 2025. Who Gets Seen in the Age of
AI? Adoption Patterns of Large Language Models in Scholarly Writing and
Citation Outcomes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08306.
Kim, Geewook, Teakgyu Hong, Moonbin Yim, et al. 2022.
“OCR-Free Document Understanding Transformer.”
In Computer Vision – ECCV 2022. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19815-1_29.
Kim, Jae Yeon, Milan de Vries, and Hahrie Han. 2025. “MapAgora, civic opportunity datasets for the study of
American local politics and public policy.”
Scientific Data 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05353-6.
Kim, Junsol, and Byungkyu Lee. 2024. AI-Augmented Surveys: Leveraging Large Language Models
and Surveys for Opinion Prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09620.
Kim, Seungone, Dongkeun Yoon, Kiril Gashteovski, et al. 2026. On the limits and opportunities of AI reviewers:
Reviewing the reviews of Nature-family papers with 45 expert
scientists. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20668.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 2021. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in
Qualitative Research, new edition. Princeton University
Press.
King, Gary, Patrick Lam, and Margaret E. Roberts. 2017. “Computer-Assisted Keyword and Document Set Discovery from
Unstructured Text.” American
Journal of Political Science 61 (4): 971–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12291.
King, Jennifer, and Tiffany Saade. 2026. Data
Privacy and Foundation Models: Can We Have
Both? Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI.
Kirschner, Paul A., and Pedro De Bruyckere. 2017. “The myths of the digital native and the
multitasker.” Teaching and
Teacher Education 67 (October): 135–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001.
Kleinberg, Jon, and Manish Raghavan. 2021. “Algorithmic monoculture and social
welfare.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 118 (22): e2018340118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018340118.
Korinek, Anton. 2023. “Generative
AI for Economic Research: Use Cases and
Implications for Economists.” Journal of Economic Literature, ahead of
print. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20231736.
Kosch, Thomas, and Sebastian Feger. 2026. “Prompt-Hacking: The New p-Hacking?”
Communications of the ACM 69 (3):
35–37.
Kotliar, Dan M. 2026. “Can’t Stop the Hype:
Scrutinizing AI’s Realities.” Journal
Article. Information, Communication & Society 29 (3):
828–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2531165.
Kozlov, Max, Dan Garisto, and Edward Chen. 2026a. “Massive budget cuts for US science proposed again by
Trump administration.” Nature 652
(8110): 547–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-01105-7.
Kozlov, Max, Dan Garisto, and Edward Chen. 2026b. “Trump Administration Proposes Massive Budget Cuts to
Science.” Scientific American, April
4. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-administration-proposes-massive-budget-cuts-to-science/.
Kozlowski, Austin C. 2026. “Computational
structuralism: Toward a formal theory of meaning in the age of digital
intelligence.” Theory and
Society 55 (2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-026-09685-z.
Kozlowski, Austin C., and James Evans. 2025. “Simulating Subjects: The Promise and Peril of Artificial
Intelligence Stand-Ins for Social Agents and
Interactions.” Sociological Methods &
Research 54 (3): 1017–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251337316.
Kozlowski, Austin C., Matt Taddy, and James A. Evans. 2019. “The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing the Meanings of Class
through Word Embeddings.” American Sociological
Review 84 (5): 905–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419877135.
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2019. Content Analysis: An
Introduction to Its Methodology. Fourth. SAGE Publications,
Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781.
Krumdick, Michael, Charles Lovering, Varshini Reddy, Seth Ebner, and
Chris Tanner. 2025. “No free labels:
Limitations of llm-as-a-judge without human grounding.”
arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05061.
Kusumegi, Keigo, Xinyu Yang, Paul Ginsparg, Mathijs de Vaan, Toby
Stuart, and Yian Yin. 2025. “Scientific
production in the era of large language models.”
Science 390 (6779): 1240–43. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adw3000.
Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the
methodology of scientific research programmes.” In
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the
International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London,
1965, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave. Cambridge
University Press.
Lambert, Nathan, Jacob Morrison, Valentina Pyatkin, et al. 2025.
Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language
Model Post-Training. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15124.
Lamont, Michèle, and Virág Molnár. 2002. “The
Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–95. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.
Landau, Martin. 1969. “Redundancy,
Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap.”
Public Administration Review 29 (4): 346–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/973247.
Lareau, Annette. 2015. “Cultural Knowledge
and Social Inequality.” American Sociological
Review 80 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414565814.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. [1979] 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific
Facts. Second. Princeton University Press.
Laurer, Moritz, Wouter van Atteveldt, Andreu Casas, and Kasper Welbers.
2025. “On Measurement Validity and Language
Models: Increasing Validity and Decreasing Bias with
Instructions.” Communication
Methods and Measures 19 (1): 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2024.2378690.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. 1961. “Notes on the
History of Quantification in Sociology–Trends, Sources and
Problems.” Isis 52 (2): 277–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/349473.
Le Mens, Gaël, and Aina Gallego. 2025. “Positioning Political Texts with Large Language Models by
Asking and Averaging.” Political
Analysis 33 (3): 274–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2024.29.
Leamer, Edward E. 1983. “Let’s Take the Con
Out of Econometrics.” American Economic
Review 73 (1): 31–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1803924.
Lee, Hao-Ping (Hank), Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, et al. 2025.
“The Impact of Generative AI on
Critical Thinking: Self-reported Reductions
in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects from a Survey of Knowledge
Workers.” Proceedings of the 2025 CHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778.
Lee, Kyuwon, Simone Paci, Jeongmin Park, Hye Young You, and Sylvan
Zheng. 2025. “Applications of
GPT in Political Science Research: Extracting Information
from Unstructured Text.” PS: Political Science
& Politics 58 (4): 630–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096525000046.
Lehmann, Matthias, Philipp B. Cornelius, and Fabian J. Sting. 2025.
“AI Meets the Classroom:
When Do Large Language Models Harm Learning?”
Pre-published March 8. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09047.
Lei, Ya-Wen, and Rachel Kim. 2024. “Automation and augmentation: artificial intelligence,
robots, and work.” Annual Review
of Sociology 50 (1): 251–72. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090523-050708.
Leng, Yan, and Yuan Yuan. 2023. Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social
Behavior? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2312.15198.
Levine, Nick, David Duvenaud, and Alec Radford. 2026. Introducing Talkie: A 13B Vintage Language Model from
1930. https://talkie-lm.com/introducing-talkie.
Licht, Hauke, Rupak Sarkar, Patrick Y. Wu, et al. 2025. “Measuring scalar constructs in social science with
LLMs.” In Proceedings of the 2025
Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,
edited by Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose,
and Violet Peng. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1635.
Lichtenberg, Nick. 2025. “Spending on AI data
centers is so massive that it’s taken a bigger chunk of GDP growth than
shopping—and it could crash the American economy.”
Fortune. https://fortune.com/2025/08/06/data-center-artificial-intelligence-bubble-consumer-spending-economy/.
Lin, Zhicheng, and Aamir Sohail. 2026. “Recalibrating academic expertise in the age of generative
AI.” Patterns 7 (1): 101473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101473.
Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of
"Muddling Through".” Public Administration
Review 19 (2): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677.
Lippert, Steffen, Anna Dreber, Magnus Johannesson, et al. 2024.
“Can large language models help predict
results from a complex behavioural science study?”
Royal Society Open Science 11 (9): 240682. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240682.
Liskov, Barbara. 1987. “Data Abstraction and
Hierarchy.” Addendum to the Proceedings on
Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA
’87) (New York, NY), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/62138.62141.
Liu, Menglin, and Ge Shi. 2024. “Enhancing
LLM-based text classification in political science: automatic prompt
optimization and dynamic exemplar selection for few-shot
learning.” arXiv preprint
arXiv:2409.01466.
Lodge, Milton, and Charles S. Taber. 2013. The Rationalizing
Voter. Cambridge University Press.
Loon, Austin van, Salvatore Giorgi, Robb Willer, and Johannes
Eichstaedt. 2022. “Negative Associations in
Word Embeddings Predict Anti-black Bias across Regions–but Only via Name
Frequency.” Proceedings of the
International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 16
(May): 1419–24. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19399.
Lu, Chris, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, et al. 2026. “Towards end-to-end automation of AI
research.” Nature 651 (8107):
914–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10265-5.
Lu, Xun, and Halbert White. 2014. “Robustness
Checks and Robustness Tests in Applied Economics.”
Journal of Econometrics 178 (Part
1): 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.016.
Luo, Xiaoxi, Zachary Shinnick, Niclas Griesshaber, et al. 2026.
Pretraining Language Models on Historical
Text. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2606.02991.
Lyman, Alex, Ethan C Busby, Lisa P Argyle, Joshua R Gubler, Bryce
Hepner, and David Wingate. 2026. “Looking
under the hood: How LLMs attempt political persuasion and
microtargeting.” Chinese Political Science
Review, 1–29.
Lyman, Alex, Bryce Hepner, Lisa P. Argyle, Ethan C. Busby, Joshua R.
Gubler, and David Wingate. 2025. “Balancing
Large Language Model Alignment and Algorithmic Fidelity in Social
Science Research.” Sociological Methods &
Research 54 (3): 1110–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251342008.
Lyttelton, Thomas, Maxim Massenkoff, and Nathan Wilmers. 2026.
“Coding Agents in the Social
Sciences.” May 27. https://www.anthropic.com/research/coding-agents-social-sciences.
Ma, Ji. 2026. “Computational Basis of Large
Language Models’ Decision Making in Social Simulation.”
Sociological Methodology 56 (1): 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00811750261421220.
Makovi, Kinga, Jean-François Bonnefon, Mayada Oudah, Anahit Sargsyan,
and Talal Rahwan. 2025. “Rewards and
punishments help humans overcome biases against cooperation partners
assumed to be machines.” iScience 28 (7): 112833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112833.
Marcus, George E., Michael MacKuen, and W. Russell Neuman. 2011.
“Parsimony and Complexity: Developing and
Testing Theories of Affective Intelligence.”
Political Psychology 32 (2): 323–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00806.x.
Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. 2000.
Affective Intelligence and Political
Judgment. University of Chicago Press.
Marsden, Peter V., and Joseph F. Swingle. 1994. “Conceptualizing and measuring culture in surveys: Values,
strategies, and symbols.” Poetics 22
(4): 269–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)90010-8.
Martin, Robert C. 2002. Agile Software
Development: Principles, Patterns, and Practices. Prentice
Hall.
Martin, Robert C. 2009. Clean Code: A Handbook
of Agile Software Craftsmanship. Prentice Hall.
Martin, Robert C. 2018. Clean Architecture: A
Craftsman’s Guide to Software Structure and Design. Prentice
Hall.
Maslej, Nestor, Loredana Fattorini, Raymond Perrault, et al. 2025.
The AI Index 2025 Annual Report. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report.
Mead, George Herbert. 1997. “Mind, Self, and
Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist.” In
Works of George Herbert Mead, edited by Charles William Morris.
University of Chicago Press.
Mei, Qiaozhu, Yutong Xie, Walter Yuan, and Matthew O. Jackson. 2024.
“A Turing test of whether AI chatbots are
behaviorally similar to humans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 121 (9): e2313925121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313925121.
Mellon, Jonathan. 2025. “Rain, rain, go away:
194 potential exclusion-restriction violations for studies using weather
as an instrumental variable.” American Journal of Political Science 69 (3):
881–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12894.
Merton, Robert K. 1948. “The Self-Fulfilling
Prophecy.” The Antioch Review 8 (2):
193–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267.
Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect
in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are
considered.” Science 159 (3810):
56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
Messeri, Lisa, and M. J. Crockett. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding in
Scientific Research.” Nature 627 (8002): 49–58.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0.
Messing, Solomon, and Josh Tucker. 2026. “The
Train Has Left the Station: Agentic AI and the Future of Social Science
Research.” In Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-train-has-left-the-station-agentic-ai-and-the-future-of-social-science-research/.
METR. 2026. Time Horizon 1.1. https://metr.org/blog/2026-1-29-time-horizon-1-1/.
Milgrom, Paul R. 1981. “Good News and Bad
News: Representation Theorems and Applications.” The Bell Journal of Economics 12 (2): 380–91.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003562.
Mohammadi, Ehsan, Mike Thelwall, Yizhou Cai, Taylor Collier, Iman
Tahamtan, and Azar Eftekhar. 2026. “Is
Generative AI Reshaping Academic Practices Worldwide?
A Survey of Adoption, Benefits, and
Concerns.” Information Processing &
Management 63 (1): 104350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104350.
Mohr, John W. 1998. “Measuring Meaning
Structures.” Annual Review of
Sociology 24 (1): 345–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.345.
Mohr, John W., and Vincent Duquenne. 1997. “The duality of culture and practice: Poverty relief in
New York City, 1888–1917.” Theory
and Society 26 (2-3): 305–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006896022092.
Mollick, Ethan. 2024. Co-Intelligence. Random
House UK.
Moraga, Cherrie, and Gloria Anzaldua, eds. 1984. In This Bridge
Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Kitchen
Table/Women of Color Press.
Moss-Racusin, Corinne A., John F. Dovidio, Victoria L. Brescoll, Mark J.
Graham, and Jo Handelsman. 2012. “Science
faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 109 (41): 16474–79. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109.
Munafò, Marcus R, Brian A Nosek, Dorothy VM Bishop, et al. 2017.
“A manifesto for reproducible
science.” Nature Human Behaviour 1
(1): 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
Munger, Kevin. 2023. “Temporal Validity as
Meta-Science.” Research &
Politics 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/205316802311872.
Munger, Kevin. 2026. Peer Review 2027. Substack
blog post. https://kevinmunger.substack.com/p/peer-review-2027.
Munger, Kevin, Bert N. Bakker, Adam J. Berinsky, et al. 2026. Peer Review 2027: Scenarios for Academic Publishing in
the Age of AI. January. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/594zj\_v1.
Munger, Kevin, Andrew M Guess, and Eszter Hargittai. 2021. “Quantitative Description of Digital Media: A Modest
Proposal to Disrupt Academic Publishing.” Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital
Media 1. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.000.
Mutzner, Nico, Taha Yasseri, and Heiko Rauhut. 2026. Normative Equivalence in Human-AI Cooperation: Behaviour,
Not Identity, Drives Cooperation in Mixed-Agent Groups.
arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2601.20487.
Nakano, Reiichiro, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, et al. 2022. WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human
feedback. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09332.
Narechania, Tejas N. 2022. “Machine Learning
as Natural Monopoly.” Iowa Law
Review 107: 1543–614. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3810366.
Nass, Clifford, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R. Tauber. 1994. “Computers are social actors.”
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems, CHI94, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191703.
Nelson, Laura K. 2021. “Leveraging the
alignment between machine learning and intersectionality: Using word
embeddings to measure intersectional experiences of the nineteenth
century U.S. South.” Poetics 88
(October): 101539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101539.
Nelson, Laura K. 2022. “Situated Knowledges
and Partial Perspectives: A Framework for Radical Objectivity in
Computational Social Science and Computational
Humanities.” New Literary History 54
(1): 853–77. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2022.a898331.
Nolan, Daniel. 2001. “What’s Wrong With
Infinite Regresses?” Metaphilosophy
32 (5): 523–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00206.
Nosek, Brian A, and Timothy M Errington. 2020. “What is replication?” PLOS biology 18 (3): e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691.
Noy, Shakked, and Whitney Zhang. 2023. “Experimental Evidence on the Productivity Effects of
Generative Artificial Intelligence.”
Science 381 (6654): 187–92. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586.
O’Laughlin, Doug, Jeremie Eliahou Ontiveros, Jordan Nanos, Dylan Patel,
and Daniel Nishball. 2026. “Claude
Code Is the Inflection Point.” SemiAnalysis,
February 5. https://web.archive.org/web/20260430141617/https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/claude-code-is-the-inflection-point.
Offer-Westort, Molly, Jiehan Liu, Nick Feamster, Kartik Garg, Nguyen
Phong Hoang, and Sudhamshu Hosamane. 2026. “Deep Canvassing with Automated Conversational Agents:
Personalized Messaging to Change Attitudes.”
Research & Politics 13 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680251414926.
Olken, Benjamin A. 2015. “Promises and Perils
of Pre-Analysis Plans.” Journal
of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.61.
Ollion, Étienne, Rubing Shen, Ana Macanovic, and Arnault Chatelain.
2024. “The dangers of using proprietary
LLMs for research.” Nature Machine
Intelligence 6 (January): 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00783-6.
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating
the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.”
Science 349 (6251): aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
OpenAI. 2026a. “ChatGPT for Data
Science & Analytics.” https://web.archive.org/web/20260330095922/https://chatgpt.com/business/ai-for-data-science-analytics/.
OpenAI. 2026b. “Prompt Engineering.” OpenAI.
https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/prompt-guidance.
Oprysko, Caitlin. 2025. “An explosion of AI
lobbying.” In Politico. https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-influence/2025/07/23/ai-lobbying-explosion-00472092.
Otis, Nicholas, Solène Delecourt, Katelyn Cranney, and Rembrand Koning.
2024. “Global evidence on gender gaps and
generative AI.” Harvard Business School Working
Paper.
Oxford University Press. 2024. Researchers and
AI Survey Findings. Oxford University Press. https://pages.oup.com/he/us/ai-survey.
Palmer, Alexis, Noah A. Smith, and Arthur Spirling. 2024. “Using Proprietary Language Models in Academic Research
Requires Explicit Justification.” Nature
Computational Science, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00585-1.
Palmer, Alexis, and Arthur Spirling. 2023. “Large Language Models Can Argue in Convincing Ways About
Politics, But Humans Dislike AI Authors: implications for
Governance.” Political Science 75
(3): 281–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2024.2335471.
Panizza, Folco, Yara Kyrychenko, and Jon Roozenbeek. 2026. “Survey-taking AI tools surpass human abilities. Here’s
what we can do about it.” Nature 650
(8101): 293–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-00386-2.
Parashar, Manish, Tess DeBlanc-Knowles, Erwin Gianchandani, and Lynne E.
Parker. 2023. “Strengthening and
Democratizing Artificial Intelligence Research and
Development.” Computer 56 (11):
85–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2023.3284568.
Pardo-Guerra, Juan Pablo, and Prithviraj Pahwa. 2022. “The Extended Computational Case Method: A Framework for
Research Design.” Sociological Methods &
Research 51 (4): 1826–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221122616.
Park, Joon Sung, Carolyn Q. Zou, Jonne Kamphorst, et al. 2024. LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable
General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2411.10109.
Parthasarathy, Ramya, Vijayendra Rao, and Nethra Palaniswamy. 2019.
“Deliberative Democracy in an Unequal World:
A Text-As-Data Study of South India’s Village Assemblies.”
American Political Science Review 113 (3): 623–40.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000182.
Patel, Dylan, AJ Kourabi, Doug O’Laughlin, and Reyk Knuhtsen. 2025.
DeepSeek Debates: Chinese Leadership On Cost, True Training
Cost, Closed Model Margin Impacts. https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/deepseek-debates.
Patwardhan, Tejal, Rachel Dias, Elizabeth Proehl, et al. 2025. GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World
Economically Valuable Tasks. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.04374.
Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2026. Agentic
AI and Social Science Research Practice. Blog
post. https://tompepinsky.com/2026/01/23/agentic-ai-and-social-science-research-practice/.
Phan, Long, Alice Gatti, Nathaniel Li, et
al. 2026. “A benchmark of expert-level
academic questions to assess AI capabilities.”
Nature 649 (8099): 1139–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09962-4.
Pichai, Sundar. 2026. “Cloud
Next ‘26: Momentum and Innovation at
Google Scale.” Google, April 22. https://web.archive.org/web/20260425012108/https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/infrastructure-and-cloud/google-cloud/cloud-next-2026-sundar-pichai/.
Poldrack, Russell. 2025. “AI-assisted Coding: 10 Simple Rules to Maintain
Scientific Rigor.” The Transmitter, ahead of
print. https://doi.org/10.53053/LCDN3424.
Politzer-Ahles, Stephen, Teresa Girolamo, and Samantha Ghali. 2020.
“Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in
academic reviewing.” Journal of
English for Academic Purposes 47: 100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100895.
Popper, Karl R. 1963. Conjectures and
refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge;
Kegan Paul.
Prallon, Brenda. 2026. How Robust are
Robustness Checks? https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19384.
Prather, James, Brent N. Reeves, Juho Leinonen, et al. 2024.
“The Widening Gap: The Benefits
and Harms of Generative AI for Novice
Programmers.” Proceedings of the ACM
Conference on International Computing Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/3632620.3671116.
Refine. 2026. Refine. Website. https://refine.sh/.
Reif, Jessica A., Richard P. Larrick, and Jack B. Soll. 2025.
“Evidence of a Social Evaluation Penalty for
Using AI.” Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 122 (19): e2426766122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2426766122.
Requarth, Tim. 2025. “From Bench to Bot:
Why AI-powered Writing May Not Deliver on
Its Promise.” The Transmitter, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.53053/HZQR1694.
Reuben, Ernesto, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales. 2014. “How stereotypes impair women’s careers in
science.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 111 (12): 4403–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314788111.
Rivera, Lauren A. 2012. “Hiring as Cultural
Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms.”
American Sociological Review 77 (6): 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412463213.
Rodman, Emma. 2020. “A Timely Intervention:
Tracking the Changing Meanings of Political Concepts with Word
Vectors.” Political Analysis 28 (1):
87–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.23.
Root, William B., and Ruth Anne Rehfeldt. 2021. “Towards a Modern-Day Teaching Machine: The Synthesis of
Programmed Instruction and Online Education.” The
Psychological Record 71 (1): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00415-0.
Rozado, David. 2024. “The political
preferences of LLMs.” PLOS ONE 19
(7): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306621.
Russo, Giuseppe, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Tim Ruben Davidson, Veniamin
Veselovsky, and Robert West. 2025. “The AI
Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores
and Acceptance Rates.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer
Interaction 9 (7): 1–28.
Ryder, Norman B. 1965. “The Cohort as a
Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American
Sociological Review 30 (6): 843. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090964.
Salazar-Miranda, Arianna, Zhuangyuan Fan, Michael Baick, et al. 2025.
“Exploring the social life of urban spaces
through AI.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 122 (30): e2424662122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2424662122.
Santurkar, Shibani, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee, Percy Liang,
and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2023. “Whose
opinions do language models reflect?” Proceedings of
the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (Honolulu,
Hawaii, USA), ICML’23.
Scheidel, Walter. 2024. “Beyond technology
and wages: power and the history of inequality.”
Oxford Open Economics 3 (Supplement_1): i212–16.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ooec/odad010.
Schmidgall, Samuel, Yusheng Su, Ze Wang, et al. 2025. Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as
Research Assistants. arXiv preprint.
Serapio-Garcı́a, Greg, Mustafa Safdari, Clément Crepy, et al. 2023.
Personality Traits in Large Language
Models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2307.00184.
Sewell, William H. 1999. “1. The Concept(s)
of Culture.” In Beyond the Cultural Turn.
University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520922167-003.
Shah, Syed Mehtab Hussain, Frank Hopfgartner, and Arnim Bleier. 2026.
Automating Computational Reproducibility in
Social Science: Comparing Prompt-Based and Agent-Based
Approaches. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.08561.
Shen, Judy Hanwen, and Alex Tamkin. 2026. “How
AI Impacts Skill Formation.” Pre-published
February 1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.20245.
Siebert, Luciano Cavalcante, Maria Luce Lupetti,
Evgeni Aizenberg, et al. 2023. “Meaningful Human Control: Actionable
Properties for AI System Development.”
AI and Ethics 3: 241–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00167-3.
Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn. 2011.
“False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed
Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything
as Significant.” Psychological
Science 22 (11): 1359–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.
Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative Behavior.
Macmillan.
Simonsohn, Uri, Joseph P. Simmons, and Leif D. Nelson. 2020.
“Specification Curve Analysis.”
Nature Human Behaviour 4 (11): 1208–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z.
Skarpelis, A. K. M. 2026. “From Archives to
Algorithms: Distance, Evidence, and Inference.”
Sociologica 20 (1): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/23642.
Sleegers, Willem, and Jamie Elsey. 2025. Adoption and Uses of LLMs among
U.S. Tech Workers. Rethink
Priorities. https://rethinkpriorities.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/LLM-industry-survey.pdf.
Soderstrom, Nicholas C., and Robert A. Bjork. 2015. “Learning versus Performance: An Integrative
Review.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 10
(2): 176–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000.
Sparrow, Betsy, Jenny Liu, and Daniel M. Wegner. 2011. “Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of
Having Information at Our Fingertips.”
Science 333 (6043): 776–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745.
Spector-Bagdady, Kayte. 2025. “The Need for
Prospective Integrity Standards for the Use of Generative
AI in Research.” The
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 53 (1). https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.41.
Spencer, Steven J., Claude M. Steele, and Diane M. Quinn. 1999.
“Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math
Performance.” Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1): 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.
Spirling, Arthur. 2023. “Why open-source
generative AI models are an ethical way forward for
science.” Nature 616: 413. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01295-4.
Spirling, Arthur. 2026. 2025–2026 Talks on
Replication, Open Models, and Social-Science Uses of Language
Models. Talks at Stanford Political Science and Yale ISPS.
Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. 2026.
Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2026.
Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. https://hai.stanford.edu/assets/files/ai_index_report_2026.pdf.
Steegen, Sara, Francis Tuerlinckx, Andrew Gelman, and Wolf Vanpaemel.
2016. “Increasing Transparency Through a
Multiverse Analysis.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (5):
702–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637.
Stewart, Rebecca. 2025. “Hi!
It’s Duo: The Marketing Strategy
Behind the Internet’s Favorite Green
Menace.” Adweek, April 8. https://web.archive.org/web/20250425210150/https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/duolingo-duo-owl-marketing-strategy/.
Stockemer, Daniel, Gabriela Galassi, and Engi Abou-El-Kheir. 2026.
“A fresh look at the publication and citation
gap between men and women: insights from economics and political
science.” Humanities and Social
Sciences Communications, ahead of print, March. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06786-z.
Stoltz, Dustin S., and Marshall A. Taylor. 2021. “Cultural cartography with word embeddings.”
Poetics 88 (October): 101567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101567.
Strauss, Claudia, and Naomi Quinn. 1998. A
Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge University
Press.
Stuhler, Oscar, Cat Dang Ton, and Étienne Ollion. 2025. “From Codebooks to Promptbooks: Extracting
Information from Text with Generative Large Language
Models.” Sociological Methods &
Research, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251336794.
Suchman, Lucy. 2007. Human-Machine
Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge
University Press.
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action:
Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological
Review 51 (2): 273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521.
Swidler, Ann. 2005. Talk of Love: How Culture
Matters. University of Chicago Press.
Tang, Chuang, Shaobo (Kevin) Li, Suming Hu, Fue Zeng, and Qianzhou Du.
2025. “Gender disparities in the impact of
generative artificial intelligence: Evidence from
academia.” PNAS Nexus 4 (2):
pgae591. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae591.
Tankelevitch, Lev, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, et al. 2024.
“The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities
of Generative AI.” Proceedings of the
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642902.
Tetenov, Aleksey. 2016. An Economic Theory of
Statistical Testing. CeMMAP Working Paper CWP50/16. Centre
for Microdata Methods; Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.cem.2016.5016.
Than, Ker. 2026. “Social Scientists Embrace
the AI Moment.” Stanford Report, April 24. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2026/04/ai-social-science-empirical-research.
Thapa, Surendrabikram, Shuvam Shiwakoti, Siddhant Bikram Shah, et al.
2025. “Large Language Models
(LLM) in Computational Social Science: Prospects, Current
State, and Challenges.” Social
Network Analysis and Mining 15 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01428-9.
The Polarization Research Lab. 2026. The Polarization Research
Lab. Website. https://polarizationresearchlab.org/.
Thomas, Kathrin. 2024. “The Advent of Survey
Experiments in Politics and International Relations.”
Government and Opposition 59 (1):
297–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.36.
Thomas, Llewellyn D. W., Angelo Kenneth G. Romasanta, and Laia Pujol
Priego. 2026. “Jagged Competencies:
Measuring the Reliability of Generative AI in
Academic Research.” Journal of
Business Research, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115804.
Thompson, Clive. 2026. “Coding after Coders:
The End of Computer Programming as We Know
It.” The New York Times Magazine, March 12. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/12/magazine/ai-coding-programming-jobs-claude-chatgpt.html.
Tong, Anna, Kenrick Cai, and Krystal Hu. 2025. “Exclusive: Google, Scale AI’s largest customer, plans
split after Meta deal, sources say.”
Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/google-scale-ais-largest-customer-plans-split-after-meta-deal-sources-say-2025-06-13/.
Topaz, Maxim, Nir Roguin, Pallavi Gupta, Zhihong Zhang, and Laura-Maria
Peltonen. 2026. “Fabricated citations: an
audit across 2.5 million biomedical papers.” Journal
Article. The Lancet 407 (10541): 1779–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00603-3.
Törnberg, Petter. 2024. “Best Practices for
Text Annotation with Large Language Models.”
Sociologica 18 (2).
Torreblanca, Carolina, William Dinneen, Guy Grossman, and Yiqing Xu.
2025. The Credibility Revolution in Political
Science. December. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/w2kmc_v1.
Tripodi, Giorgio, Xiang Zheng, Yifan Qian, et al. 2025. “Tenure and research trajectories.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 122 (30). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2500322122.
Tsvetkova, Milena, Ruth Garcı́a-Gavilanes, Luciano Floridi, and Taha
Yasseri. 2017. “Even good bots fight: The
case of Wikipedia.” PLOS ONE 12 (2):
e0171774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171774.
Tsvetkova, Milena, Taha Yasseri, Niccolo Pescetelli, and Tobias Werner.
2024. “A New Sociology of Humans and
Machines.” Nature Human Behaviour 8 (10):
1864–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02001-8.
Turkle, Sherry. 2013. Alone Together: Why We
Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic
Books.
Twyman, Janet S. 2020. “Programmed
Instruction.” In The Encyclopedia of
Child and Adolescent Development, edited
by Stephen Hupp and Jeremy Jewell. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad095.
Underwood, Ted, Laura K. Nelson, and Matthew Wilkens. 2025. Can Language Models Represent the Past without
Anachronism? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2505.00030.
Uprichard, Emma, Roger Burrows, and David Byrne. 2008. “SPSS as an ’Inscription Device’: From Causality to
Description?” The Sociological
Review 56 (4): 606–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2008.00807.x.
Van Noorden, Richard, and Jeffrey M. Perkel. 2023. “AI and science: what 1, 600 researchers
think.” Nature 621 (7980): 672–75.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02980-0.
Varnum, Michael E. W., Nicolas Baumard, Mohammad Atari, and Kurt Gray.
2024. “Large Language Models based on
historical text could offer informative tools for behavioral
science.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 121 (42). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2407639121.
Vaswani, Ashish, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, et al. 2017.
Attention Is All You Need. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1706.03762.
Velez, Yamil R., Donald P. Green, and Semra Sevi. 2025. “Chatbot Voting Advice Applications inform but seldom sway
young unaligned voters.” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 122 (50): e2515516122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2515516122.
Vendraminelli, Luca, Matthew DosSantos DiSorbo, Annika Hildebrandt,
Edward McFowland III, Arvind Karunakaran, and Iavor Bojinov. 2025.
The GenAI Wall Effect: Examining the Limits to
Horizontal Expertise Transfer Between Occupational Insiders and
Outsiders. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5462694.
Vernon, Vaughn. 2013. Implementing Domain-Driven
Design. Addison-Wesley.
Voelkel, Jan G, Michael N Stagnaro, James Y Chu, et
al. 2024. “Megastudy testing 25
treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan
animosity.” Science 386 (6719):
eadh4764. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4764.
Voteview. 2026. Voteview. Website. https://voteview.com/.
Voyer, Andrea, Zachary D. Kline, and Madison Danton. 2022. “Symbols of class: A computational analysis of class
distinction-making through etiquette, 1922-2017.”
Poetics 94 (October): 101734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101734.
Wald, Abraham. 1950. Statistical Decision
Functions. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books?id=nq0gAAAAMAAJ.
Wallace, David Foster. 2009. This Is Water:
Some Thoughts, Delivered on a Significant Occasion about Living a
Compassionate Life. Little, Brown.
Wallace, Michael, and Arne L. Kalleberg. 1982. “Industrial Transformation and the Decline of Craft: The
Decomposition of Skill in the Printing Industry,
1931-1978.” American Sociological
Review 47 (3): 307. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094988.
Wang, Chenglong, Haoyu Tang, Xiyuan Yang, et al. 2025. “Uncovering inequalities in new knowledge learning by
large language models across different languages.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 122 (51). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2514626122.
Watters, Audrey. 2021. Teaching Machines:
The History of Personalized Learning. The MIT
Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12262.001.0001.
Webb, Beatrice. 1926. My Apprenticeship. Longmans,
Green; Co.
Webb, Taylor, Keith J. Holyoak, and Hongjing Lu. 2023. “Emergent analogical reasoning in large language
models.” Nature Human Behaviour 7
(9): 1526–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01659-w.
Wenger, Emily, and Yoed N Kenett. 2026. “Large language models are homogeneously
creative.” PNAS Nexus 5 (3):
pgag042. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag042.
Westwood, Sean J. 2025. “The potential
existential threat of large language models to online survey
research.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 122 (47). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2518075122.
Westwood, Sean J., and Samuel Frederick. 2026. “Reply to Van der Stigchel et al.: Empirical evidence that
AI survey contamination is real and substantial.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 123 (8). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2537420123.
White, Halbert. 2000. “A Reality Check for
Data Snooping.” Econometrica 68 (5):
1097–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00152.
Wiley. 2025. AI Adoption Jumps to 84% among
Researchers as Expectations Undergo Significant Reality
Check. Press release. https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/AI-Adoption-Jumps-to-84-Among-Researchers-as-Expectations-Undergo-Significant-Reality-Check/default.aspx.
Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A Vocabulary
of Culture and Society. Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical
Investigations. Blackwell Publishers.
Wu, Patrick Y. 2026. Beyond Price: A Technical
Quality Framework for AI Antitrust. SSRN ID
6078646. SSRN Working Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6078646.
Wu, Patrick Y., Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker, and Solomon Messing.
2023. Large Language Models Can Be Used to
Estimate the Latent Positions of Politicians. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12057.
Xiao, Tianqi, Francesco Fuso Nerini, H. Damon Matthews, Massimo Tavoni,
and Fengqi You. 2025. “Environmental Impact
and Net-Zero Pathways for Sustainable Artificial Intelligence Servers in
the USA.” Nature
Sustainability 8: 1541–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01681-y.
Xu, Haotian, and Wenqin Shen. 2026. “From
tool to partner: generative AI usage patterns and research performance
among doctoral students.” Studies
in Higher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2026.2625386.
Xu, Ruoxi, Yingfei Sun, Mengjie Ren, et al. 2024. “AI for Social Science and Social Science of
AI: A Survey.” Information
Processing & Management 61 (3): 103665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103665.
Xu, Yiqing, and Leo Yang Yang. 2026. Scaling
Reproducibility: An AI-Assisted Workflow for Large-Scale Replication and
Reanalysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16733.
Yu, Jiachen, Shaoning Sun, Xiaohui Hu, Jiaxu Yan, Kaidong Yu, and
Xuelong Li. 2025. “Improve llm-as-a-judge
ability as a general ability.” Proceedings of the 2025
Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,
14110–26.
Zeff, Maxwell. 2026. “How Claude Code
Is Reshaping Software–and Anthropic.”
Wired, January 22. https://www.wired.com/story/claude-code-success-anthropic-business-model/.
Zhang, Jiaxing, and Shuaishuai Feng. 2021. “Machine learning modeling: A new way to do quantitative
research in social sciences in the era of AI.” Journal of Web Engineering 20 (2): 281–302.
Zhang, Simone, Janet Xu, and AJ Alvero. 2025. “Generative AI Meets Open-Ended Survey Responses: Research
Participant Use of AI and Homogenization.”
Sociological Methods & Research 54 (3):
1197–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251327130.
Zhang, Yanzhao, Mingxin Li, Dingkun Long, et
al. 2025. Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing
Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05176.
Zhang, Yongjun. 2025. Generative AI has lowered
the barriers to computational social sciences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10833.
Zhang, Yongjun. 2026. Vibe Researching as Wolf
Coming: Can AI Agents with Skills Replace or Augment Social
Scientists? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2602.22401.
Zhao, Zhenyue, Yihe Wang, Toby Stuart, Mathijs De Vaan, Paul Ginsparg,
and Yian Yin. 2026. LLM hallucinations in the
wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07723.
Zheng, Lianmin, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, et al. 2024. “Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-bench and Chatbot
Arena.” Proceedings of the 37th International
Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Red Hook, NY,
USA), NIPS ’23.
Zhou, Naitian, David Bamman, and Isaac L. Bleaman. 2025. “Culture is Not Trivia: Sociocultural Theory for Cultural
NLP.” Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the
Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers),
25869–86. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1256.
Zhuo, Jingming, Songyang Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Haodong Duan, Dahua Lin, and
Kai Chen. 2024. “ProSA: Assessing and
Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs.”
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP
2024, November. https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-emnlp.108/.
Ziems, Caleb, William Held, Omar Shaikh, Jiaao Chen, Zhehao Zhang, and
Diyi Yang. 2024. “Can Large Language Models Transform
Computational Social Science?” Computational
Linguistics (Cambridge, MA) 50 (1): 237–91. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00502.