References

Abdelnabi, Sahar, and Ahmed Salem. 2025. The Hawthorne Effect in Reasoning Models: Evaluating and Steering Test Awareness. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14617.

Abdurahman, Suhaib, Alireza Salkhordeh Ziabari, Alexander K. Moore, Daniel M. Bartels, and Morteza Dehghani. 2025. “A Primer for Evaluating Large Language Models in Social-Science Research.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251325174.

Abraham, Louis, Charles Arnal, and Antoine Marie. 2025. “Prompt selection matters: enhancing text annotations for social sciences with large language models.” Journal of Computational Social Science 8 (3): 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-025-00388-6.

Acemoglu, Daron, and Pascual Restrepo. 2022. “Tasks, Automation, and the Rise in U.S. Wage Inequality.” Econometrica 90 (5): 1973–2016. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta19815.

Acharya, Deepak Bhaskar, Karthigeyan Kuppan, and B. Divya. 2025. “Agentic AI: Autonomous Intelligence for Complex Goals–A Comprehensive Survey.” IEEE Access 13: 18912–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3532853.

Achmann-Denkler, Michael, Mario Haim, and Christian Wolff. 2025. “GPT-4o for Visual Political Communication: Toward Automated Image Type Analysis.” Proceedings of the 17th ACM Web Science Conference 2025, Websci ’25, May, 504–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3717867.3717881.

Aczel, Balazs et al. 2026. “Investigating the Analytical Robustness of the Social and Behavioural Sciences.” Nature 652: 135–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09844-9.

Adcock, Robert, and David Collier. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 529–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055401003100.

Ahluwalia, Aman, and Suhrud Wani. 2024. Leveraging Large Language Models for Web Scraping. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2406.08246.

Ahmed, Nur, and Muntasir Wahed. 2020. The De-democratization of AI: Deep Learning and the Compute Divide in Artificial Intelligence Research. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.15581.

Aigner, Ernest, Jacob Greenspon, and Dani Rodrik. 2025. “The global distribution of authorship in economics journals.” World Development 189: 106926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106926.

Albertson, Bethany, and Shana Kushner Gadarian. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge University Press.

Alegria, Sharla, and Catherine Yeh. 2023. “Machine Learning and the Reproduction of Inequality.” Contexts 22 (4): 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/15365042231210827.

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2003. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford University Press.

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2015. “Measuring, counting, interpreting: Our debate on methods continues.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 3 (3): 309–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2015.13.

Alexander, Rohan. 2023. Telling Stories with Data: With Applications in R and Python. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://tellingstorieswithdata.com/.

Alizadeh, Meysam, Maël Kubli, Zeynab Samei, et al. 2025. “Open-source LLMs for text annotation: a practical guide for model setting and fine-tuning.” Journal of Computational Social Science 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00345-9.

Allman, Elizabeth, Catherine Matias, and John Rhodes. 2009. “Identifiability of Parameters in Latent Structure Models with Many Observed Variables.” Annals of Statistics 37 (6A): 3099–132. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOS689.

Almaatouq, Abdullah, Mohammed Alsobay, Ming Yin, and Duncan J Watts. 2021. “Task complexity moderates group synergy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (36): e2101062118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101062118.

Almaatouq, Abdullah, Joshua Aaron Becker, Michael Bernstein, et al. 2021. Scaling up experimental social, behavioral, and economic science. December. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wksv8_v1.

Alvero, A. J., Dustin S. Stoltz, Oscar Stuhler, and Marshall A. Taylor. 2026. “Generative AI in Sociological Research: State of the Discipline.” Sociological Science 13 (January): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.15195/v13.a3.

Amano, Tatsuya, Valeria Ramı́rez-Castañeda, Violeta Berdejo-Espinola, et al. 2023. “The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science.” PLOS Biology 21 (7): e3002184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184.

American Economic Association. 2026. AER Editorial Policy. American Economic Association. https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/aer/editorial-policy.

American Political Science Association. 2026. “Statement on the Proposed Elimination of the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Directorate at the National Science Foundation.” APSA. https://apsanet.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/FINAL-Dissolution-of-SBE.pdf.

American Political Science Review. 2026. Preparing Your Materials. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/information/author-instructions/preparing-your-materials.

Amershi, Saleema, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, et al. 2019. Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233.

Andrews, Isaiah, and Maximilian Kasy. 2019. “Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias.” American Economic Review 109 (8): 2766–94. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180310.

Antecol, Heather, Kelly Bedard, and Jenna Stearns. 2018. “Equal but Inequitable: Who Benefits from Gender-Neutral Tenure Clock Stopping Policies?” American Economic Review 108 (9): 2420–41. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160613.

Anthropic. 2024. Golden Gate Claude. https://www.anthropic.com/news/golden-gate-claude.

Anthropic. 2026a. Project Glasswing: Securing Critical Software for the AI Era. https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing.

Anthropic. 2026b. “Prompt Engineering Overview.” Anthropic. https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/overview.

Anthropic. 2026c. System Card: Claude Mythos Preview. https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/7624816413e9b4d2e3ba620c5a5e091b98b190a5.pdf.

Arel-Bundock, Vincent, Ryan C. Briggs, Hristos Doucouliagos, Marco Mendoza Aviña, and T. D. Stanley. 2026. “Quantitative Political Science Research is Greatly Underpowered.” Journal of Politics 88 (1): 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1086/734279.

Argyle, Lisa P., Christopher A. Bail, Ethan C. Busby, et al. 2023. “Leveraging AI for democratic discourse: Chat interventions can improve online political conversations at scale.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (41): e2311627120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2311627120.

Argyle, Lisa P., Ethan C. Busby, Nancy Fulda, Joshua R. Gubler, Christopher Rytting, and David Wingate. 2023. “Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples.” Political Analysis 31 (3): 337–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2023.2.

Argyle, Lisa P., Ethan C. Busby, Joshua R. Gubler, Alex Lyman, et al. 2025. “Testing theories of political persuasion using AI.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (18). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2412815122.

Argyle, Lisa P., Ethan C. Busby, and Joshua R. Gubler. 2026. “AI All the Way down: Infinite Regress and the Future of Quantitative Social Science.” In Quantitative Social Science in the Age of AI, edited by Rohan Alexander. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://rohanalexander.github.io/notes_on_the_future/.

Argyle, Lisa P., Ethan C. Busby, Joshua R. Gubler, Bryce Hepner, Alex Lyman, and David Wingate. 2025. “Arti-‘fickle’ intelligence: using LLMs as a tool for inference in the political and social sciences.” Nature Computational Science 5: 737–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-025-00843-4.

Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao, Jinghuan Ma, Ting Chen, et al. 2025. “Generative AI and Academic Scientists in US Universities: Perception, Experience, and Adoption Intentions.” PLOS ONE 20 (8): e0330416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330416.

Arseniev-Koehler, Alina, and Jacob G. Foster. 2022. “Machine Learning as a Model for Cultural Learning: Teaching an Algorithm What it Means to be Fat.” Sociological Methods & Research 51 (4): 1484–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221122603.

Ashery, Ariel Flint, Luca Maria Aiello, and Andrea Baronchelli. 2025. “Emergent Social Conventions and Collective Bias in LLM Populations.” Science Advances 11 (20). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adu9368.

Ashwin, Julian, Aditya Chhabra, and Vijayendra Rao. 2025. “Using Large Language Models for Qualitative Analysis can Introduce Serious Bias.” Sociological Methods & Research 55 (3): 795–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251338246.

Atreja, Shubham, Joshua Ashkinaze, Lingyao Li, Julia Mendelsohn, and Libby Hemphill. 2025. “What’s in a Prompt?: A Large-Scale Experiment to Assess the Impact of Prompt Design on the Compliance and Accuracy of LLM-Generated Text Annotations.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 19: 122–45. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35807.

Attewell, Paul. 2001. “Comment: The First and Second Digital Divides.” Sociology of Education 74 (3): 252–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277.

Autor, David H., Frank Levy, and Richard J. Murnane. 2003. “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1279–333. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801.

Bai, Xuechunzi, Angelina Wang, Ilia Sucholutsky, and Thomas L. Griffiths. 2025. “Explicitly Unbiased Large Language Models Still Form Biased Associations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (8): e2416228122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2416228122.

Bail, Christopher A. 2014. “The cultural environment: measuring culture with big data.” Theory and Society 43 (3-4): 465–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9216-5.

Bail, Christopher A. 2024. “Can Generative AI Improve Social Science?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (21): e2314021121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314021121.

Barari, Soubhik, Jarret Angbazo, Natalie Wang, et al. 2025. AI-Assisted Conversational Interviewing: Effects on Data Quality and Respondent Experience. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13908.

Barari, Soubhik, Diwas Bhattarai, and Joshua Y. Lerner. 2026. Position: Measuring Bias in AI Agents Is (Still) a Social Science Measurement Challenge. https://openreview.net/pdf?id=gYaR4LxoBa.

Barari, Soubhik, and Tyler Simko. 2023. “LocalView, a database of public meetings for the study of local politics and policy-making in the United States.” Scientific Data 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02044-y.

Barrie, Christopher, and Roberto Cerina. 2026. Synthetic personas distort the structure of human belief systems. February. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/n7fq8_v1.

Barrie, Christopher, Elli Palaiologou, and Petter Törnberg. 2025. Prompt Stability Scoring for Text Annotation with Large Language Models. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.02039.

Barrie, Christopher, Alexis Palmer, and Arthur Spirling. 2025. “Replication for Language Models: Problems, Principles, and Best Practices for Political Science.” https://arthurspirling.org/documents/BarriePalmerSpirling_TrustMeBro.pdf.

Bastani, Hamsa, Osbert Bastani, Alp Sungu, Haosen Ge, Özge Kabakcı, and Rei Mariman. 2025. “Generative AI without Guardrails Can Harm Learning: Evidence from High School Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (26): e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122.

Baumann, Joachim, Jiaxin Pei, Sanmi Koyejo, and Dirk Hovy. 2026. Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.03202.

Baumann, Joachim, Paul Röttger, Aleksandra Urman, et al. 2025. Large Language Model Hacking: Quantifying the Hidden Risks of Using LLMs for Text Annotation. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.08825.

Bazazi, Sepideh, Jurgis Karpus, and Taha Yasseri. 2025. “AI’s assigned gender affects human-AI cooperation.” iScience 28 (12): 113905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113905.

Beaman, Jean. 2015. “Boundaries of Frenchness: cultural citizenship and France’s middle-class North African second-generation.” Identities 22 (1): 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289x.2014.931235.

Beatty, Sally. 2024. “Khan Academy and Microsoft Partner to Expand Access to AI Tools That Personalize Teaching and Help Make Learning Fun.” Microsoft Source, May 21. https://web.archive.org/web/20250325224614/https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/ai/khan-academy-and-microsoft-partner-to-expand-access-to-ai-tools/.

Beauvoir, Simone de. (1949) 2011. The Second Sex. Vintage.

Bendor, Jonathan. 1995. “A Model of Muddling Through.” American Political Science Review 89 (4): 819–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082511.

Bendor, Jonathan. 2010. Bounded rationality and politics. University of California Press.

Bendor, Jonathan. 2015. “Incrementalism: Dead yet Flourishing.” Public Administration Review 75 (2): 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12333.

Benjamini, Yoav, and Yosef Hochberg. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 57 (1): 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.

Bennett, Sue, Karl Maton, and Lisa Kervin. 2008. “The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39 (5): 775–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x.

Besiroglu, Tamay, Sage Andrus Bergerson, Amelia Michael, Lennart Heim, Xueyun Luo, and Neil Thompson. 2024. The Compute Divide in Machine Learning: A Threat to Academic Contribution and Scrutiny? arXiv:2401.02452; arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.02452.

Bianchini, Stefano, Moritz Müller, and Pierre Pelletier. 2025. “Drivers and Barriers of AI Adoption and Use in Scientific Research.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 220: 124303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124303.

Bisbee, James, Joshua D. Clinton, Cassy Dorff, Brenton Kenkel, and Jennifer M. Larson. 2024. “Synthetic Replacements for Human Survey Data? The Perils of Large Language Models.” Political Analysis 32 (4): 401–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2024.5.

Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon, and Robert A. Bjork. 2011. “Making Things Hard on Yourself, but in a Good Way: Creating Desirable Difficulties to Enhance Learning.” In Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, edited by Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Richard W. Pew, Leaetta M. Hough, and James R. Pomerantz. Worth Publishers.

Bjork, Robert A. 1975. “Retrieval as a Memory Modifier.” In Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium, edited by Robert L. Solso. Erlbaum.

Blair, J. C., R. S. Ryan, and L. A. Schutzenhofer. 2012. Elements of Engineering Excellence. NASA/CR—2012-217471. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20130000445/downloads/20130000445.pdf.

Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (Jan): 993–1022.

Block, Ray, Charles Crabtree, John B. Holbein, and J. Quin Monson. 2021. “Are Americans less likely to reply to emails from Black people relative to White people?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (52). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110347118.

Boelaert, Julien, Samuel Coavoux, Étienne Ollion, Ivaylo Petev, and Patrick Präg. 2024. Machine Bias. Generative Large Language Models Have a View of Their Own. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/r2pnb.

Boelaert, Julien, Samuel Coavoux, Étienne Ollion, Ivaylo Petev, and Patrick Präg. 2025. “Machine Bias. How Do Generative Language Models Answer Opinion Polls?” Sociological Methods & Research 54 (3): 1156–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251330582.

Bol, Thijs, Mathijs de Vaan, and Arnout van de Rijt. 2018. “The Matthew effect in science funding.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (19): 4887–90. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115.

Bolukbasi, Tolga, Kai-Wei Chang, James Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam Kalai. 2016. Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06520.

Bommasani, Rishi, Kathleen A. Creel, Ananya Kumar, Dan Jurafsky, and Percy Liang. 2022. “Picking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture lead to Outcome Homogenization?” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, vol. 35. Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/17a234c91f746d9625a75cf8a8731ee2-Paper-Conference.pdf.

Bonikowski, Bart, Yuchen Luo, and Oscar Stuhler. 2022. “Politics as Usual? Measuring Populism, Nationalism, and Authoritarianism in U.S. Presidential Campaigns (1952–2020) with Neural Language Models.” Sociological Methods & Research 51 (4): 1721–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221122317.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1979) 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice. Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Social Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson. Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2008. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Polity Press.

Boutyline, Andrei, and Alina Arseniev-Koehler. 2025. “Meaning in Hyperspace: Word Embeddings as Tools for Cultural Measurement.” Annual Review of Sociology 51 (1): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090324-024027.

Boutyline, Andrei, Alina Arseniev-Koehler, and Devin J Cornell. 2023. “School, Studying, and Smarts: Gender Stereotypes and Education Across 80 Years of American Print Media, 1930–2009.” Social Forces 102 (1): 263–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soac148.

Boykis, Vicki. 2026a. “Build Yourself Flowers.” April 20. https://web.archive.org/web/20260426035611/https://vickiboykis.com/2026/04/20/build-yourself-flowers/.

Boykis, Vicki. 2026b. “NASA Elements of Engineering Excellence.” April 5. https://web.archive.org/web/20260430181213/https://vickiboykis.com/2026/04/05/nasa-elements-of-engineering-excellence/.

Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. Monthly Review Press.

Breen, Casey F., and Dennis M. Feehan. 2024. “New Data Sources for Demographic Research.” Population and Development Review 51 (1): 539–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12671.

Brewer, Alexandra, Melissa Osborne, Anna S. Mueller, Daniel M. O’Connor, Arjun Dayal, and Vineet M. Arora. 2020. “Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt? Performance Evaluations, Medical Errors, and the Production of Gender Inequality in Emergency Medical Education.” American Sociological Review 85 (2): 247–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420907066.

Breznau, Nate, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke, et al. 2022. “Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (44): e2203150119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203150119.

Briggs, Ryan C., Jonathan Mellon, and Vincent Arel-Bundock. 2026. “It Must Be Very Hard to Publish Null Results.” https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/zr5vf_v1.

Brodeur, Abel, and Bruno Barbarioli. 2025. The Replication Engine: How to Build Automated Replication Infrastructure for Better, Faster Science. Institute for Progress. https://ifp.org/the-replication-engine/.

Brodeur, Abel, and Bruno Barbarioli. 2026. “The Shifting Production Function: AI, Reproducibility, and the Future of Quantitative Social Science.” In Quantitative Social Science in the Age of AI, edited by Rohan Alexander. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://rohanalexander.github.io/notes_on_the_future/.

Brodeur, Abel, Nikolai Cook, and Anthony Heyes. 2020. “Methods Matter: P-Hacking and Publication Bias in Causal Analysis in Economics.” American Economic Review 110 (11): 3634–60. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190687.

Brodeur, Abel, Nikolai Cook, and Carina Neisser. 2024. “p-Hacking, Data type and Data-Sharing Policy.” The Economic Journal 134 (659): 985–1018. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead104.

Brodeur, Abel, Mathias Lé, Marc Sangnier, and Yanos Zylberberg. 2016. “Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8 (1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150044.

Brodeur, Abel, David Valenta, Alexandru Marcoci, et al. 2026. “AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123 (22). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2524747123.

Brooks, Frederick P. (1975) 1995. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering Anniversary Edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Brown, Megan A., Shubham Atreja, Libby Hemphill, and Patrick Y. Wu. 2026. “The Context Dependency of Demographic Bias in LLM Annotation.” Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’26, 7475–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/3805689.3812212.

Brown, Tom, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, et al. 2020. “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. F. Balcan, and H. Lin, vol. 33. Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf.

Bryan, Jenny. 2018. “Code Smells and Feels.” userR! 2018, Brisbane, July. https://github.com/jennybc/code-smells-and-feels.

Brynjolfsson, Erik, Bharat Chandar, and Ruyu Chen. 2025. Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford Digital Economy Lab. https://digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/publications/canaries-in-the-coal-mine/.

Büchi, Moritz, Natascha Just, and Michael Latzer. 2015. “Modeling the Second-Level Digital Divide: A Five-Country Study of Social Differences in Internet Use.” New Media & Society 18 (11): 2703–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604154.

Buskirk, Trent D., and Frederick Conrad. 2024. Refitting the Fit for Purpose Framework for New and Emerging Data Sources [Conference Presentation]. https://aapor.confex.com/aapor/2024/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/2370.

Buskirk, Trent D., and Antje Kirchner. 2020. “Why Machines Matter for Survey and Social Science Researchers: Exploring Applications of Machine Learning Methods for Design, Data Collection, and Analysis.” In Big Data Meets Survey Science. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118976357.ch1.

Buskirk, Trent, Adam Eck, and Jerry Timbrook. 2025. The Task Is to Improve the Ask: An Experiment for Developing Prompts to Generate High Quality Survey Items from Large Language Models. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5377878.

Butler, Daniel M., and Charles Crabtree. 2017. “Moving Beyond Measurement: Adapting Audit Studies to Test Bias-Reducing Interventions.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 4 (1): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2017.11.

Camerer, Colin F., Anna Dreber, Eskil Forsell, et al. 2016. “Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in Economics.” Science 351 (6280): 1433–36. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918.

Cameron, Ross. 2025. “Infinite Regress Arguments.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2025, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/infinite-regress/.

Cameron, William Bruce. 1963. Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking. Random House.

Campbell, Donald T. 1979. “Assessing the impact of planned social change.” Evaluation and Program Planning 2 (1): 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X.

Cantwell Smith, Brian. 2019. The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment. The MIT Press.

Carammia, Marcello, Stefano Maria Iacus, and Giuseppe Porro. 2024. Rethinking Scale: The Efficacy of Fine-Tuned Open-Source LLMs in Large-Scale Reproducible Social Science Research. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00890.

Carbon Credits. 2026. NVIDIA Controls 92% of the GPU Market in 2025 and Reveals Next Gen AI Supercomputer. https://carboncredits.com/nvidia-controls-92-of-the-gpu-market-in-2025-and-reveals-next-gen-ai-supercomputer/.

Carley, Kathleen. 1994. “Extracting culture through textual analysis.” Poetics 22 (4): 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)90011-6.

Carlini, Nicholas, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee, Florian Tramer, and Chiyuan Zhang. 2023. “Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models.” The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=TatRHT_1cK.

Carlson, Natalie A., and Vanessa Burbano. 2026. “The Use of LLMs to Annotate Data in Management Research: Foundational Guidelines and Warnings.” Strategic Management Journal 47 (3): 699–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70023.

Chan, Jun Shern, Neil Chowdhury, Oliver Jaffe, et al. 2025. MLE-Bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07095.

Chen, Jowei, and Jonathan Rodden. 2015. “Cutting Through the Thicket: Redistricting Simulations and the Detection of Partisan Gerrymanders.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 14 (4): 331–45. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2015.0317.

Chen, Lingjiao, Matei Zaharia, and James Zou. 2024. “How Is ChatGPT’s Behavior Changing Over Time?” Harvard Data Science Review 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.5317da47.

Chen, Yanda, Joe Benton, Ansh Radhakrishnan, et al. 2025. Reasoning Models Don’t Always Say What They Think. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05410.

Cheng, Joe, and Sara Altman. 2025. “Databot Is Not a Flotation Device.” Posit, August 25. https://web.archive.org/web/20250910084327/https://posit.co/blog/databot-is-not-a-flotation-device/.

Chiang, Ted. 2024. “Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art.” The New Yorker, August 31. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art.

Chiang, Wei-Lin, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, et al. 2024. Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04132.

Chugunova, Marina, Dietmar Harhoff, Katharina Hölzle, et al. 2026. “Who Uses AI in Research, and for What? Large-scale Survey Evidence from Germany.” Research Policy 55 (2): 105381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105381.

Chugunova, Marina, and Daniela Sele. 2022. “We and It: An interdisciplinary review of the experimental evidence on how humans interact with machines.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 99: 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2022.101897.

Clifford, Scott, and Spencer Piston. 2017. “Explaining Public Support for Counterproductive Homelessness Policy: The Role of Disgust.” Political Behavior 39 (2): 503–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9366-4.

Cochrane, Christopher, Michael Cowan, Christopher Greenaway, and Rohan Alexander. 2026. “The Qualitative Turn in Quantitative Methods.” Unpublished manuscript.

Cockburn, Alistair. 2005. “Hexagonal Architecture.” https://alistair.cockburn.us/hexagonal-architecture/.

Collins, Patricia Hill. (1990) 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. Routledge.

Coppock, Alexander, Seth J. Hill, and Lynn Vavreck. 2020. “The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: Evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments.” Science Advances 6 (36): eabc4046. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc4046.

Correll, Shelley J. 2001. “Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessments.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 1691–730. https://doi.org/10.1086/321299.

Correll, Shelley J. 2004. “Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations.” American Sociological Review 69 (1): 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900106.

Correll, Shelley J., and Cecilia L. Ridgeway. 2006. “Expectation States Theory.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John Delamater. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-x_2.

Corrigan, Jack, Ngor Luong, and Christian Schoeberl. 2024. Acquiring AI Companies: Tracking U.S. AI Mergers and Acquisitions. https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/acquiring-ai-companies-tracking-u-s-ai-mergers-and-acquisitions/.

Costello, Thomas H., Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2024. “Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through dialogues with AI.” Science 385 (6714). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq1814.

Couper, Mick P. 2008. Designing Effective Web Surveys. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511499371.

Cox, Emily, Fiona Shirani, and Paul Rouse. 2024. “Voices from the Algorithm: Large Language Models in Social Research.” Energy Research & Social Science 113: 103559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103559.

Crabtree, Charles, John Holbein, Mitchell Bosley, and Semra Sevi. 2025. Can AI Help Reduce Prejudice? Evaluating the Effectiveness of AI-Powered Personalized Persuasion on Support for Transgender Rights. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5229084.

Cranney, Katelyn, Solène Delecourt, and Rembrand Koning. 2026. Global Evidence on Gender Gaps and Generative AI Over Time. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 25-023. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=66548.

Crawford, Kate. 2021. Atlas of AI. Yale University Press.

Criddle, Cristina. 2024. “Character.ai abandons making AI models after $2.7bn Google deal.” In Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/f2a9b5d4-05fe-4134-b4fe-c24727b85bba.

Cruces, Guillermo, Diego Fernández Meijide, Sebastian Galiani, Ramiro H. Gálvez, and María Lombardi. 2026. Does Generative AI Narrow Education-Based Productivity Gaps? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. No. 34851. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w34851.

Cuevas, Alejandro, Jennifer V. Scurrell, Eva M. Brown, Jason Entenmann, and Madeleine I. G. Daepp. 2025. “Collecting Qualitative Data at Scale with Large Language Models: A Case Study.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 9 (2): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3710947.

Czajka, John L., and Amy Beyler. 2016. Declining Response Rates in Federal Surveys: Trends and Implications. Mathematica Policy Research. https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/private/pdf/255531/Decliningresponserates.pdf.

Dahl, Robert A. 1961. “The behavioral approach in political science: Epitaph for a monument to a successful protest.” American Political Science Review 55 (4): 763–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952525.

Dannefer, Dale. 2003. “Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course: Cross-Fertilizing Age and Social Science Theory.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 58 (6): S327–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.s327.

Danús, Lluı́s, William Dinneen, Carolina Torreblanca, Guy Grossman, and Sandra González-Bailón. 2026. “Informal connections outweigh coauthorship ties in academic impact.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123 (18): e2511050123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2511050123.

Darling, Kate. 2021. The New Breed: What Our History with Animals Reveals About Our Future with Robots. Henry Holt & Co.

Davidovic, Jovana. 2023. “On the Purpose of Meaningful Human Control of AI.” Frontiers in Big Data 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.1017677.

Davidson, Thomas. 2024. “Start Generating: Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sociological Research.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 10 (January): 23780231241259651. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241259651.

Davidson, Thomas. 2026. “A Relational Approach to Agentic AI in Social Science Research: Projects, Roles, and Tasks.” In Quantitative Social Science in the Age of AI, edited by Rohan Alexander. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://rohanalexander.github.io/notes_on_the_future/.

Davidson, Thomas, and Daniel Karell. 2025. “Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence into Social Science Research: Measurement, Prompting, and Simulation.” Sociological Methods & Research 54 (3): 775–93. https://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/W7ZYSTDICBC6JQGTTTGM/full.

Dell’Acqua, Fabrizio, Edward McFowland, Ethan Mollick, et al. 2026. “Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality.” Organization Science 37 (2): 403–23. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.21838.

DeMello, Margo. 2012. Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. Columbia University Press.

DeVellis, Robert F., and Carolyn T. Thorpe. 2022. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 5th ed. SAGE Publications.

Dever, Jill A., Ashley Amaya, Anup Srivastav, et al. 2020. “Fit for Purpose in Action: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of the National Internet Flu Survey.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 9 (3): 449–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz050.

Devlin, Jacob, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding.” Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 4171–86. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1423.

Di Tillio, Alfredo, Marco Ottaviani, and Peter Norman Sørensen. 2021. “Strategic Sample Selection.” Econometrica 89 (2): 911–53. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17288.

Dillman, Don A., Jolene D. Smyth, and Leah Melani Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645.

DiMaggio, Paul. 1987. “Classification in Art.” American Sociological Review 52 (4): 440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095290.

DiMaggio, Paul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 23 (1): 263–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263.

DiMaggio, Paul, and Filiz Garip. 2012. “Network Effects and Social Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology 38: 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545.

DiMaggio, Paul, and Eszter Hargittai. 2001. From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Working Paper 47. Princeton University, School of Public; International Affairs, Center for Arts; Cultural Policy Studies. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/cpanda/15.html.

DiMaggio, Paul, Manish Nag, and David M. Blei. 2013. “Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding.” Poetics 41 (6): 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004.

DiPrete, Thomas A., and Gregory M. Eirich. 2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology 32 (1): 271–97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127.

DORA. 2012. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. https://sfdora.org/read/.

Doshi, Anil R., and Oliver P. Hauser. 2024. “Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content.” Science Advances 10 (28). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290.

Druckman, James N., and Donald P. Green, eds. 2021. Advances in Experimental Political Science. Cambridge University Press.

Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903) 1994. The Souls of Black Folk. Dover.

Eads, Alicia, and Fedor Dokshin. 2026. “Fault Lines: Inequality and the Future of Quantitative Social Science in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.” In Quantitative Social Science in the Age of AI, edited by Rohan Alexander. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://rohanalexander.github.io/notes_on_the_future/.

Eaton, Asia A., Jessica F. Saunders, Ryan K. Jacobson, and Keon West. 2020. “How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates.” Sex Roles 82 (3-4): 127–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w.

Egami, Naoki, Musashi Hinck, Brandon M. Stewart, and Hanying Wei. 2026. “Using Large Language Model Annotations for the Social Sciences: A General Framework of Using Predicted Variables in Downstream Analyses.” American Journal of Political Science. https://naokiegami.com/paper/dsl_ss.pdf.

Egami, Naoki, Musashi Hinck, Brandon Stewart, and Hanying Wei. 2023. “Using Imperfect Surrogates for Downstream Inference: Design-Based Supervised Learning for Social Science Applications of Large Language Models.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, and S. Levine, vol. 36. Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/file/d862f7f5445255090de13b825b880d59-Paper-Conference.pdf.

Ellington, Aimee J. 2003. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Calculators on Students’ Achievement and Attitude Levels in Precollege Mathematics Classes.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 34 (5): 433. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034795.

Engzell, Per, and Nathan Wilmers. 2026. The Paper Factory. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/24xfq_v1.

Evans, Eric. 2004. Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Fan, Yizhou, Luzhen Tang, Huixiao Le, et al. 2025. “Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance.” British Journal of Educational Technology 56 (2): 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544.

Fanon, Frantz. (1952) 2008. Black Skin, White Masks. Grove Press.

Farquhar, Sebastian, Jannik Kossen, Lorenz Kuhn, and Yarin Gal. 2024. “Detecting Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Semantic Entropy.” Nature 630 (8017): 625–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07421-0.

Fifield, Benjamin, Michael Higgins, Kosuke Imai, and Alexander Tarr. 2020. “Automated Redistricting Simulation Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 29 (4): 715–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2020.1739532.

Filimonovic, Dragan, Christian Rutzer, and Conny Wunsch. 2025. Can GenAI Improve Academic Performance? Evidence from the Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02408.

Fishman, Nic, and Gabriel Sekeres. 2026. “Editorial Screening when Science is Cheap.” Working paper. https://njw.fish/static/papers/agentic_specification.pdf.

Fontana, Nicolò, Francesco Pierri, and Luca Maria Aiello. 2025. “Nicer than Humans: How Do Large Language Models Behave in the Prisoner’s Dilemma?” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 19: 522–35. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35829.

Foster, Jacob G. 2018. “Culture and computation: Steps to a Probably Approximately Correct theory of culture.” Poetics 68: 144–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.04.007.

Franco, Annie, Neil Malhotra, and Gabor Simonovits. 2014. “Publication Bias in the Social Sciences: Unlocking the File Drawer.” Science 345 (6203): 1502–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484.

Frankel, Alexander, and Maximilian Kasy. 2022. “Which Findings Should Be Published?” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 14 (1): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20190133.

Freedman, David. 1999. “From Association to Causation: Some Remarks on the History of Statistics.” Statistical Science 14 (3). https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009212409.

Freelon, Deen. 2018. “Computational Research in the Post-API Age.” Political Communication 35 (4): 665–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1477506.

Fuchs, Anna, Anna-Carolina Haensch, and Wiebke Weber. 2026. AI for Survey Design: Generating and Evaluating Survey Questions with Large Language Models [Conference Presentation]. https://aapor.confex.com/aapor/2026/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/5304.

Gaddis, S. Michael, Edvard Nergård Larsen, Charles Crabtree, and John B. Holbein. 2022. Discrimination against Black and Hispanic Americans is highest in hiring and housing contexts: A meta-analysis of correspondence audits. SSRN Working Paper No. 5255039. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3975770.

Gai, Phyliss Jia, Jiayi Hou, and Yanping Tu. 2025. Competence Penalty Is a Barrier to the Adoption of New Technology. SSRN Working Paper No. 5255039. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5255039.

Gallegos, Isabel O., Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, et al. 2024. “Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey.” Computational Linguistics (Cambridge, MA) 50 (3): 1097–179. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00524.

Gao, Jian, and Dashun Wang. 2024. “Quantifying the use and potential benefits of artificial intelligence in scientific research.” Nature Human Behaviour 8 (12): 2281–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02020-5.

Gebru, Timnit, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, et al. 2021. “Datasheets for datasets.” Communications of the ACM 64 (12): 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723.

Geertz, Clifford. (1973) 2009. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books.

Geiecke, Friedrich, and Xavier Jaravel. 2024. Conversations at Scale: Robust AI-led Interviews with a Simple Open-Source Platform. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4974382.

Gelman, Andrew, and John Carlin. 2014. “Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type s (Sign) and Type m (Magnitude) Errors.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (6): 641–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642.

Gelman, Andrew, and Eric Loken. 2013. “The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There Is No ‘Fishing Expedition’ or ‘p-Hacking’ and the Research Hypothesis Was Posited Ahead of Time.” https://sites.stat.columbia.edu/gelman/research/unpublished/p_hacking.pdf.

Gelman, Andrew, and Eric Loken. 2014. “The Statistical Crisis in Science.” American Scientist 102 (6): 460–65. https://doi.org/10.1511/2014.111.460.

Gerlich, Michael. 2025. “AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking.” Societies 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006.

Gerring, John. 1999. “What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences.” Polity 31 (3): 357–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235246.

Gilardi, Fabrizio, Meysam Alizadeh, and Maël Kubli. 2023. “ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (30): e2305016120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2305016120.

González-Rostani, Valentina, and Shir Raviv. 2026. Tracing AI Assistance and AI Agents in Survey Research. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6576218.

Google Cloud. 2026. “What Is Prompt Engineering?” Google Cloud. https://cloud.google.com/discover/what-is-prompt-engineering.

Gordon, Sanford C., Cyrus Samii, and Zhihao Su. 2025. Data-NoMAD: A Tool for Boosting Confidence in the Integrity of Social Science Survey Data. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.14651.

Greenblatt, Ryan, Carson Denison, Benjamin Wright, et al. 2024. Alignment Faking in Large Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14093.

Greengard, Samuel. 2025. “The AI Deskilling Paradox.” Communications of the ACM, November 7. https://web.archive.org/web/20251110043905/https://cacm.acm.org/news/the-ai-deskilling-paradox/.

Grimmer, Justin, Margaret E. Roberts, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2022. Text as data: A new framework for machine learning and the social sciences. Princeton University Press.

Grimmer, Justin, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028.

Griswold, Wendy. 1987. “The Fabrication of Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britain, and the West Indies.” American Journal of Sociology 92 (5): 1077–117. https://doi.org/10.1086/228628.

Grossman, Sanford J. 1981. “The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure About Product Quality.” Journal of Law and Economics 24 (3): 461–83. https://doi.org/10.1086/467025.

Grossmann, Igor, Matthew Feinberg, Dawn C Parker, Nicholas A Christakis, Philip E Tetlock, and William A Cunningham. 2023. “AI and the transformation of social science research.” Science 380 (6650): 1108–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1778.

Groves, Robert M. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. In Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471725277.

Guo, Daya, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, et al. 2025. “DeepSeek-R1 incentivizes reasoning in LLMs through reinforcement learning.” Nature 645 (8081): 633–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z.

Hall, Andy. 2026a. “AI is already 10x-ing academic research. How do we get to 100x?” Substack Newsletter. In The Roots of Progress. https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/ai-is-already-10x-ing-academic-research.

Hall, Andy. 2026b. “The 100x Research Institution.” Substack Newsletter. In Free Systems. https://freesystems.substack.com/p/the-100x-research-institution.

Halterman, Andrew, and Katherine A. Keith. 2026. “Codebook LLMs: Evaluating LLMs as Measurement Tools for Political Science Concepts.” Political Analysis 34 (2): 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2025.10017.

Handa, Kunal, Alex Tamkin, Miles McCain, et al. 2025. Which Economic Tasks Are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.04761.

Hanson, Mark A., Pablo Gómez Barreiro, Paolo Crosetto, and Dan Brockington. 2024. “The strain on scientific publishing.” Quantitative Science Studies 5 (4): 823–43. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327.

Hao, Qianyue, Fengli Xu, Yong Li, and James Evans. 2026. “Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus.” Nature, January, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09922-y.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.

Hardinges, Jack, Elena Simperl, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2024. “We Must Fix the Lack of Transparency Around the Data Used to Train Foundation Models.” Harvard Data Science Review, nos. Special Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.a50ec6e6.

Hargittai, Eszter. 2002. “Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills.” First Monday 7 (4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942.

Hawking, Stephen. 1996. The illustrated a brief history of time: Updated and expanded edition. Bantam.

He, Yongyuan, and Yi Bu. 2026. “Academic Journals’ AI Policies Fail to Curb the Surge in AI-assisted Academic Writing.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123 (9): e2526734123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2526734123.

Heath, Anthony, Stephen Fisher, and Shawna Smith. 2005. “The Globalization Of Public Opinion Research.” Annual Review of Political Science 8 (1): 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.090203.103000.

Hembree, Ray, and Donald J. Dessart. 1986. “Effects of Hand-Held Calculators in Precollege Mathematics Education: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 17 (2): 83–99. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.17.2.0083.

Henry, Emeric. 2009. “Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty.” The Economic Journal 119 (539): 1036–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02265.x.

Henry, Emeric, and Marco Ottaviani. 2019. “Research and the Approval Process: The Organization of Persuasion.” American Economic Review 109 (3): 911–55. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171919.

Henshall, Will. 2024. “There’s an AI Lobbying Frenzy in Washington. Big Tech Is Dominating.” In Time. https://time.com/6972134/ai-lobbying-tech-policy-surge/.

Herresthal, Claudia. 2022. “Hidden Testing and Selective Disclosure of Evidence.” Journal of Economic Theory 200: 105312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2021.105312.

Hicks, Cat. 2026a. Learning Goal: A Claude Code Skill for Structured Goal Setting with Mental Contrasting. Released April 21. https://github.com/DrCatHicks/learning-goal.

Hicks, Cat. 2026b. Learning Opportunities: A Claude Code Skill for Deliberate Skill Development. Released April 22. https://github.com/DrCatHicks/learning-opportunities.

Hicks, Diana, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, and Ismael Rafols. 2015. “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.” Nature 520 (7548): 429–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a.

Holst, Dirk, Keno Moenck, Julian Koch, Ole Schmedemann, and Thorsten Schüppstuhl. 2025. “Transparent Reporting of AI in Systematic Literature Reviews: Development of the PRISMA-trAIce Checklist.” JMIR AI 4: e80247. https://doi.org/10.2196/80247.

Hommel, Björn E., Franz-Josef M. Wollang, Veronika Kotova, Hannes Zacher, and Stefan C. Schmukle. 2022. “Transformer-Based Deep Neural Language Modeling for Construct-Specific Automatic Item Generation.” Psychometrika 87 (2): 749–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09823-9.

Hosseini, Soodeh, and Hossein Seilani. 2025. “The role of agentic AI in shaping a smart future: A systematic review.” Array 26: 100399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.100399.

Houghton, James P., and Duncan J. Watts. 2025. The role of topic choice in cross-partisan conversations. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nygt3_v1.

Huang, Lei, Weijiang Yu, Weitao Ma, et al. 2025. “A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems 43 (2): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3703155.

Huh, Minyoung, Brian Cheung, Tongzhou Wang, and Phillip Isola. 2024. “Position: The Platonic Representation Hypothesis.” In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, edited by Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Zico Kolter, Katherine Heller, et al., vol. 235. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/huh24a.html.

Humlum, Anders, and Emilie Vestergaard. 2025. “The unequal adoption of ChatGPT exacerbates existing inequalities among workers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (1). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2414972121.

Humphries, Mark, Lianne C. Leddy, Quinn Downton, et al. 2024. Unlocking the Archives: Using Large Language Models to Transcribe Handwritten Historical Documents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03340.

Idahl, Maximilian, and Zahra Ahmadi. 2025. “OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviews.” In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (System Demonstrations), edited by Nouha Dziri, Sean (Xiang) Ren, and Shizhe Diao. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-demo.44.

Imai, Kosuke. 2017. Quantitative Social Science: An Introduction. Princeton University Press.

Imas, Alex, and Soumitra Shukla. 2026. “How Will AI-driven Automation Actually Affect Jobs?: The Economics of AI Exposure and Job Displacement.” March 23. https://aleximas.substack.com/p/how-will-ai-driven-automation-actually.

Ioannidis, John P. A. 2005. “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” PLOS Medicine 2 (8): e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.

Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038.

Jensen, Jeffrey L., Daniel Karell, Cole Tanigawa-Lau, Nizar Habash, Mai Oudah, and Dhia Fairus Shofia Fani. 2022. “Language Models in Sociological Research: An Application to Classifying Large Administrative Data and Measuring Religiosity.” Sociological Methodology 52 (1): 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/00811750211053370.

Jepperson, Ronald L., and Ann Swidler. 1994. “What properties of culture should we measure?” Poetics 22 (4): 359–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)90014-0.

Jerit, Jennifer, and Jason Barabas. 2023. “Are Nonprobability Surveys Fit for Purpose?” Public Opinion Quarterly 87 (3): 816–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad037.

Jin, Berber. 2025. “Anthropic is on track to turn a profit much faster than OpenAI.” The Wall Street Journal, November 10. https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-anthropic-profitability-e9f5bcd6.

Jošt, Gregor, Viktor Taneski, and Sašo Karakatič. 2024. “The impact of large language models on programming education and student learning outcomes.” Applied Sciences 14 (10): 4115. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14104115.

Joyce, Kelly, Laurel Smith-Doerr, Sharla Alegria, et al. 2021. “Toward a Sociology of Artificial Intelligence: A Call for Research on Inequalities and Structural Change.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 7 (January). https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023121999581.

Juavinett, Ashley. 2026. “How to Teach Programming in the Age of AI.” The Transmitter, March 30. https://doi.org/10.53053/IXOZ2506.

Juavinett, Ashley, and Cat Hicks. 2026. You Can Learn with AI. Season 2, episode 4, February 16. https://www.buzzsprout.com/2396236/episodes/18692591-you-can-learn-with-ai.

Kaiser, Tamás, Tamás Tóth, and Marton Demeter. 2023. “Publishing Trends in Political Science: How Publishing Houses, Geographical Positions, and International Collaboration Shapes Academic Knowledge Production.” Publishing Research Quarterly 39 (3): 201–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-023-09957-x.

Kamenica, Emir, and Matthew Gentzkow. 2011. “Bayesian Persuasion.” American Economic Review 101 (6): 2590–615. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2590.

Kane, John V. 2025. “More than meets the ITT: A guide for anticipating and investigating nonsignificant results in survey experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 12 (1): 110–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2024.1.

Karjus, Andres. 2025. “Machine-assisted quantitizing designs: augmenting humanities and social sciences with artificial intelligence.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04503-w.

Kasy, Maximilian. 2021. “Of Forking Paths and Tied Hands: Selective Publication of Findings, and What Economists Should Do about It.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 35 (3): 175–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.3.175.

Kasy, Maximilian, and Jann Spiess. 2025. “Optimal Pre-Analysis Plans: Statistical Decisions Subject to Implementability.” Working paper. https://maxkasy.github.io/home/files/papers/optimal_preanalysis_plans.pdf.

Kazimirov, Alexandros. 2025. Mergers & Cooptive Acquisitions. https://www.antitrustinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/AAI-Paper-Mergers-Cooptive-Acquisitions.pdf.

Kellogg, Katherine C., Melissa A. Valentine, and Angéle Christin. 2020. “Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control.” Academy of Management Annals 14 (1): 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174.

Khan, Farhan Kamrul, Hazem Ibrahim, Nouar Aldahoul, Talal Rahwan, and Yasir Zaki. 2025. Who Gets Seen in the Age of AI? Adoption Patterns of Large Language Models in Scholarly Writing and Citation Outcomes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08306.

Kim, Geewook, Teakgyu Hong, Moonbin Yim, et al. 2022. “OCR-Free Document Understanding Transformer.” In Computer Vision – ECCV 2022. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19815-1_29.

Kim, Jae Yeon, Milan de Vries, and Hahrie Han. 2025. “MapAgora, civic opportunity datasets for the study of American local politics and public policy.” Scientific Data 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05353-6.

Kim, Junsol, and Byungkyu Lee. 2024. AI-Augmented Surveys: Leveraging Large Language Models and Surveys for Opinion Prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09620.

Kim, Seungone, Dongkeun Yoon, Kiril Gashteovski, et al. 2026. On the limits and opportunities of AI reviewers: Reviewing the reviews of Nature-family papers with 45 expert scientists. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20668.

King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 2021. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, new edition. Princeton University Press.

King, Gary, Patrick Lam, and Margaret E. Roberts. 2017. “Computer-Assisted Keyword and Document Set Discovery from Unstructured Text.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (4): 971–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12291.

King, Jennifer, and Tiffany Saade. 2026. Data Privacy and Foundation Models: Can We Have Both? Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI. https://hai.stanford.edu/policy/data-privacy-and-foundation-models-can-we-have-both.

Kirschner, Paul A., and Pedro De Bruyckere. 2017. “The myths of the digital native and the multitasker.” Teaching and Teacher Education 67 (October): 135–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001.

Kleinberg, Jon, and Manish Raghavan. 2021. “Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (22): e2018340118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018340118.

Knox, Dean, Will Lowe, and Jonathan Mummolo. 2020. “Administrative Records Mask Racially Biased Policing.” American Political Science Review 114 (3): 619–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000039.

Knox, Dean, and Christopher Lucas. 2021. “A Dynamic Model of Speech for the Social Sciences.” American Political Science Review 115 (2): 649–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542000101X.

Korinek, Anton. 2023. “Generative AI for Economic Research: Use Cases and Implications for Economists.” Journal of Economic Literature 61 (4): 1281–317. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20231736.

Kosch, Thomas, and Sebastian Feger. 2026. “Prompt-Hacking: The New p-Hacking?” Communications of the ACM 69 (3): 35–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3744911.

Kosmyna, Nataliya, Eugene Hauptmann, Ye Tong Yuan, et al. 2025. Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872.

Kotliar, Dan M. 2026. “Can’t Stop the Hype: Scrutinizing AI’s Realities.” Information, Communication & Society 29 (3): 828–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2531165.

Kozlov, Max, Dan Garisto, and Edward Chen. 2026a. “Massive budget cuts for US science proposed again by Trump administration.” Nature 652 (8110): 547–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-01105-7.

Kozlov, Max, Dan Garisto, and Edward Chen. 2026b. “Trump Administration Proposes Massive Budget Cuts to Science.” Scientific American, April 4. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-administration-proposes-massive-budget-cuts-to-science/.

Kozlowski, Austin C. 2026. “Computational structuralism: Toward a formal theory of meaning in the age of digital intelligence.” Theory and Society 55 (2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-026-09685-z.

Kozlowski, Austin C., and James Evans. 2025. “Simulating Subjects: The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence Stand-Ins for Social Agents and Interactions.” Sociological Methods & Research 54 (3): 1017–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251337316.

Kozlowski, Austin C., Matt Taddy, and James A. Evans. 2019. “The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing the Meanings of Class through Word Embeddings.” American Sociological Review 84 (5): 905–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419877135.

Krippendorff, Klaus. 2019. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781.

Krumdick, Michael, Charles Lovering, Varshini Reddy, Seth Ebner, and Chris Tanner. 2026. No Free Labels: Limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge Without Human Grounding. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05061.

Kusumegi, Keigo, Xinyu Yang, Paul Ginsparg, Mathijs de Vaan, Toby Stuart, and Yian Yin. 2025. “Scientific production in the era of large language models.” Science 390 (6779): 1240–43. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adw3000.

Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave. Cambridge University Press.

Lambert, Nathan, Jacob Morrison, Valentina Pyatkin, et al. 2025. Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15124.

Lamont, Michèle, and Virág Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–95. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.

Landau, Martin. 1969. “Redundancy, Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap.” Public Administration Review 29 (4): 346–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/973247.

Lanham, Tamera, Anna Chen, Ansh Radhakrishnan, et al. 2023. Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13702.

Lareau, Annette. 2015. “Cultural Knowledge and Social Inequality.” American Sociological Review 80 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414565814.

Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. (1979) 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. 2nd ed. Princeton University Press.

Laurer, Moritz, Wouter van Atteveldt, Andreu Casas, and Kasper Welbers. 2025. “On Measurement Validity and Language Models: Increasing Validity and Decreasing Bias with Instructions.” Communication Methods and Measures 19 (1): 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2024.2378690.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F. 1961. “Notes on the History of Quantification in Sociology–Trends, Sources and Problems.” Isis 52 (2): 277–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/349473.

Le Mens, Gaël, and Aina Gallego. 2025. “Positioning Political Texts with Large Language Models by Asking and Averaging.” Political Analysis 33 (3): 274–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2024.29.

Leamer, Edward E. 1983. “Let’s Take the Con Out of Econometrics.” American Economic Review 73 (1): 31–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1803924.

Lee, Hao-Ping (Hank), Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, et al. 2025. “The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects from a Survey of Knowledge Workers.” Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778.

Lee, Jinsook, Conrad Borchers, A. J. Alvero, Thorsten Joachims, and Rene F. Kizilcec. 2026. The Digital Divide in Generative AI: Evidence from Large Language Model Use in College Admissions Essays. arXiv:2602.17791; arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.17791.

Lee, Kyuwon, Simone Paci, Jeongmin Park, Hye Young You, and Sylvan Zheng. 2025. “Applications of GPT in Political Science Research: Extracting Information from Unstructured Text.” PS: Political Science & Politics 58 (4): 630–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096525000046.

Lee, Sanguk, Tai-Quan Peng, Matthew H. Goldberg, et al. 2024. “Can large language models estimate public opinion about global warming? An empirical assessment of algorithmic fidelity and bias.” PLOS Climate 3 (8): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000429.

Lehmann, Matthias, Philipp B. Cornelius, and Fabian J. Sting. 2025. “AI Meets the Classroom: When Do Large Language Models Harm Learning?” Pre-published March 8. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09047.

Lei, Ya-Wen, and Rachel Kim. 2024. “Automation and augmentation: artificial intelligence, robots, and work.” Annual Review of Sociology 50 (1): 251–72. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090523-050708.

Lemley, Mark A., and Matthew T. Wansley. 2025. “Coopting Disruption.” Boston University Law Review 105.

Leng, Yan, and Yuan Yuan. 2023. Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social Behavior? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2312.15198.

Levine, Nick, David Duvenaud, and Alec Radford. 2026. Introducing Talkie: A 13B Vintage Language Model from 1930. https://talkie-lm.com/introducing-talkie.

Licht, Hauke, Rupak Sarkar, Patrick Y. Wu, et al. 2025. “Measuring scalar constructs in social science with LLMs.” In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, edited by Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and Violet Peng. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1635.

Lichtenberg, Nick. 2025. “Spending on AI data centers is so massive that it’s taken a bigger chunk of GDP growth than shopping—and it could crash the American economy.” Fortune. https://fortune.com/2025/08/06/data-center-artificial-intelligence-bubble-consumer-spending-economy/.

Lin, Hause, Gabriela Czarnek, Benjamin Lewis, et al. 2025. “Persuading Voters Using Human–Artificial Intelligence Dialogues.” Nature, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09771-9.

Lin, Zhicheng, and Aamir Sohail. 2026. “Recalibrating Academic Expertise in the Age of Generative AI.” Patterns 7 (1): 101473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101473.

Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’.” Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677.

Lippert, Steffen, Anna Dreber, Magnus Johannesson, et al. 2024. “Can large language models help predict results from a complex behavioural science study?” Royal Society Open Science 11 (9): 240682. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240682.

Liskov, Barbara. 1987. “Data Abstraction and Hierarchy.” Addendum to the Proceedings on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA ’87) (New York, NY), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/62138.62141.

Liu, Menglin, and Ge Shi. 2024. “Enhancing LLM-based text classification in political science: automatic prompt optimization and dynamic exemplar selection for few-shot learning.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01466.

Lodge, Milton, and Charles S. Taber. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge University Press.

Lu, Chris, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, et al. 2026. “Towards end-to-end automation of AI research.” Nature 651 (8107): 914–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10265-5.

Lu, Xun, and Halbert White. 2014. “Robustness Checks and Robustness Tests in Applied Economics.” Journal of Econometrics 178 (Part 1): 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.016.

Luo, Xiaoxi, Zachary Shinnick, Niclas Griesshaber, et al. 2026. Pretraining Language Models on Historical Text. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2606.02991.

Lyman, Alex, Ethan C. Busby, Lisa P. Argyle, Joshua R. Gubler, Bryce Hepner, and David Wingate. 2026. “Looking under the hood: How LLMs attempt political persuasion and microtargeting.” Chinese Political Science Review, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-026-00336-3.

Lyman, Alex, Bryce Hepner, Lisa P. Argyle, Ethan C. Busby, Joshua R. Gubler, and David Wingate. 2025. “Balancing Large Language Model Alignment and Algorithmic Fidelity in Social Science Research.” Sociological Methods & Research 54 (3): 1110–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251342008.

Lyttelton, Thomas, Maxim Massenkoff, and Nathan Wilmers. 2026. “Coding Agents in the Social Sciences.” May 27. https://www.anthropic.com/research/coding-agents-social-sciences.

Ma, Ji. 2026. “Computational Basis of Large Language Models’ Decision Making in Social Simulation.” Sociological Methodology 56 (1): 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00811750261421220.

Maiorino, Antonio, Zoe Padgett, Chun Wang, Misha Yakubovskiy, and Peng Jiang. 2023. “Application and Evaluation of Large Language Models for the Generation of Survey Questions.” Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM ’23, October, 5244--5245. https://doi.org/10.1145/3583780.3615506.

Makovi, Kinga, Jean-François Bonnefon, Mayada Oudah, Anahit Sargsyan, and Talal Rahwan. 2025. “Rewards and punishments help humans overcome biases against cooperation partners assumed to be machines.” iScience 28 (7): 112833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112833.

Marcus, George E., Michael MacKuen, and W. Russell Neuman. 2011. “Parsimony and Complexity: Developing and Testing Theories of Affective Intelligence.” Political Psychology 32 (2): 323–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00806.x.

Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. University of Chicago Press.

Marsden, Peter V., and Joseph F. Swingle. 1994. “Conceptualizing and measuring culture in surveys: Values, strategies, and symbols.” Poetics 22 (4): 269–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)90010-8.

Martin, Robert C. 2002. Agile Software Development: Principles, Patterns, and Practices. Prentice Hall.

Martin, Robert C. 2009. Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship. Prentice Hall.

Martin, Robert C. 2018. Clean Architecture: A Craftsman’s Guide to Software Structure and Design. Prentice Hall.

Maslej, Nestor, Loredana Fattorini, Raymond Perrault, et al. 2025. The AI Index 2025 Annual Report. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report.

McCarthy, John. 2007. What is Artificial Intelligence? http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/whatisai/whatisai.pdf.

McCloskey, Adam, and Pascal Michaillat. 2024. “Critical Values Robust to P-hacking.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01456.

Mead, George Herbert. 1997. “Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist.” In Works of George Herbert Mead, edited by Charles William Morris. University of Chicago Press.

Mei, Qiaozhu, Yutong Xie, Walter Yuan, and Matthew O. Jackson. 2024. “A Turing test of whether AI chatbots are behaviorally similar to humans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (9): e2313925121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313925121.

Mellon, Jonathan. 2025. “Rain, rain, go away: 194 potential exclusion-restriction violations for studies using weather as an instrumental variable.” American Journal of Political Science 69 (3): 881–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12894.

Merton, Robert K. 1948. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” The Antioch Review 8 (2): 193–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267.

Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.

Messeri, Lisa, and M. J. Crockett. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding in Scientific Research.” Nature 627 (8002): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0.

Messing, Solomon, and Josh Tucker. 2026. The Train Has Left the Station: Agentic AI and the Future of Social Science Research. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-train-has-left-the-station-agentic-ai-and-the-future-of-social-science-research/.

METR. 2026. Time Horizon 1.1. https://metr.org/blog/2026-1-29-time-horizon-1-1/.

Meyer, Bruce D., Wallace K. C. Mok, and James X. Sullivan. 2015. “Household Surveys in Crisis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (4): 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.4.199.

Milgrom, Paul R. 1981. “Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications.” The Bell Journal of Economics 12 (2): 380–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003562.

Mimno, David, Hanna Wallach, Edmund Talley, Miriam Leenders, and Andrew McCallum. 2011. “Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models.” Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 262–72.

Minaee, Shervin, Tomas Mikolov, Narjes Nikzad, et al. 2025. Large Language Models: A Survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06196.

Mitchell, Melanie. 2021. Why AI is Harder Than We Think. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12871.

Mohammadi, Ehsan, Mike Thelwall, Yizhou Cai, Taylor Collier, Iman Tahamtan, and Azar Eftekhar. 2026. “Is Generative AI Reshaping Academic Practices Worldwide? A Survey of Adoption, Benefits, and Concerns.” Information Processing & Management 63 (1): 104350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104350.

Mohr, John W. 1998. “Measuring Meaning Structures.” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1): 345–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.345.

Mohr, John W., and Vincent Duquenne. 1997. “The duality of culture and practice: Poverty relief in New York City, 1888–1917.” Theory and Society 26 (2-3): 305–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006896022092.

Mollick, Ethan. 2024. Co-Intelligence. Random House UK.

Moon, Kibum, Adam E. Green, and Kostadin Kushlev. 2025. “Homogenizing Effect of Large Language Models (LLMs) on Creative Diversity: An Empirical Comparison of Human and ChatGPT Writing.” Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100207.

Moraga, Cherrie, and Gloria Anzaldua, eds. 1984. In This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Kitchen Table/Women of Color Press.

Moss-Racusin, Corinne A., John F. Dovidio, Victoria L. Brescoll, Mark J. Graham, and Jo Handelsman. 2012. “Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (41): 16474–79. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109.

Munafò, Marcus R., Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy V. M. Bishop, et al. 2017. “A manifesto for reproducible science.” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (1): 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.

Munger, Kevin. 2023. “Temporal Validity as Meta-Science.” Research & Politics 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/205316802311872.

Munger, Kevin. 2026. Peer Review 2027. Substack blog post. https://kevinmunger.substack.com/p/peer-review-2027.

Munger, Kevin, Bert N. Bakker, Adam J. Berinsky, et al. 2026. Peer Review 2027: Scenarios for Academic Publishing in the Age of AI. January. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/594zj_v1.

Munger, Kevin, Andrew M. Guess, and Eszter Hargittai. 2021. “Quantitative Description of Digital Media: A Modest Proposal to Disrupt Academic Publishing.” Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media 1. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.000.

Mutzner, Nico, Taha Yasseri, and Heiko Rauhut. 2026. Normative Equivalence in Human-AI Cooperation: Behaviour, Not Identity, Drives Cooperation in Mixed-Agent Groups. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2601.20487.

Myers, Kyle R., Wei Yang Tham, Yian Yin, et al. 2020. “Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.” Nature Human Behaviour 4 (9): 880–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y.

Narayan, Avanika, Ines Chami, Laurel Orr, Simran Arora, and Christopher Ré. 2022. Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data? https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09911.

Narayanan, Arvind, and Sayash Kapoor. 2025. AI as Normal Technology [Essay]. Knight First Amendment Institute. https://knightcolumbia.org/content/ai-as-normal-technology.

Narechania, Tejas N. 2022. “Machine Learning as Natural Monopoly.” Iowa Law Review 107: 1543–614. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3810366.

Nass, Clifford, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R. Tauber. 1994. “Computers are social actors.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI94, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191703.

Needham, Joe, Giles Edkins, Govind Pimpale, Henning Bartsch, and Marius Hobbhahn. 2025. Large Language Models Often Know When They Are Being Evaluated. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23836.

Nelson, Laura K. 2021. “Leveraging the alignment between machine learning and intersectionality: Using word embeddings to measure intersectional experiences of the nineteenth century U.S. South.” Poetics 88 (October): 101539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101539.

Nelson, Laura K. 2022. “Situated Knowledges and Partial Perspectives: A Framework for Radical Objectivity in Computational Social Science and Computational Humanities.” New Literary History 54 (1): 853–77. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2022.a898331.

Nisbett, Richard E., and Timothy D. Wilson. 1977. “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes.” Psychological Review 84 (3): 231–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231.

Nolan, Daniel. 2001. “What’s Wrong With Infinite Regresses?” Metaphilosophy 32 (5): 523–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00206.

Nosek, Brian A., and Timothy M. Errington. 2020. “What is replication?” PLOS biology 18 (3): e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691.

Noy, Shakked, and Whitney Zhang. 2023. “Experimental Evidence on the Productivity Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence.” Science 381 (6654): 187–92. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586.

O’Grady, Cathleen. 2025. “AI-Generated ’Participants’ Can Lead Social Science Experiments Astray, Study Finds.” Science 390 (6769). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.z232cbo.

O’Laughlin, Doug, Jeremie Eliahou Ontiveros, Jordan Nanos, Dylan Patel, and Daniel Nishball. 2026. “Claude Code Is the Inflection Point.” SemiAnalysis, February 5. https://web.archive.org/web/20260430141617/https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/claude-code-is-the-inflection-point.

O’Shaughnessy, Eric. 2021. “Toward a More Productive Discourse on Rooftop Solar and Energy Justice.” Joule 5 (10): 2535–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.08.006.

Offer-Westort, Molly, Jiehan Liu, Nick Feamster, Kartik Garg, Nguyen Phong Hoang, and Sudhamshu Hosamane. 2026. “Deep Canvassing with Automated Conversational Agents: Personalized Messaging to Change Attitudes.” Research & Politics 13 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680251414926.

Olken, Benjamin A. 2015. “Promises and Perils of Pre-Analysis Plans.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.61.

Ollion, Étienne, Rubing Shen, Ana Macanovic, and Arnault Chatelain. 2024. “The dangers of using proprietary LLMs for research.” Nature Machine Intelligence 6 (January): 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00783-6.

Olson, Kristen, and Trent D. Buskirk. 2026. “‘ChatBot’ Is a Two Syllable Word...or Is It?: Using Generative AI for Survey Question Readability Assessments.” International Journal of Market Research 68 (1): 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853251389789.

Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349 (6251): aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.

OpenAI. 2026a. “ChatGPT for Data Science & Analytics.” https://web.archive.org/web/20260330095922/https://chatgpt.com/business/ai-for-data-science-analytics/.

OpenAI. 2026b. “Prompt Engineering.” OpenAI. https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/prompt-guidance.

Oprysko, Caitlin. 2025. “An explosion of AI lobbying.” In Politico. https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-influence/2025/07/23/ai-lobbying-explosion-00472092.

Orne, Martin T. 1962. “On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications.” American Psychologist 17 (11): 776–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043424.

Ornstein, Joseph T., Elise N. Blasingame, and Jake S. Truscott. 2025. “How to Train Your Stochastic Parrot: Large Language Models for Political Texts.” Political Science Research and Methods 13 (2): 264–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.64.

Ouyang, Long, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, et al. 2022. “Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, vol. 35. Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/b1efde53be364a73914f58805a001731-Paper-Conference.pdf.

Oxford University Press. 2024. Researchers and AI Survey Findings. Oxford University Press. https://pages.oup.com/he/us/ai-survey.

Palmer, Alexis, Noah A. Smith, and Arthur Spirling. 2023. “Using Proprietary Language Models in Academic Research Requires Explicit Justification.” Nature Computational Science 4 (1): 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00585-1.

Palmer, Alexis, and Arthur Spirling. 2023. “Large Language Models Can Argue in Convincing Ways About Politics, But Humans Dislike AI Authors: implications for Governance.” Political Science 75 (3): 281–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2024.2335471.

Panizza, Folco, Yara Kyrychenko, and Jon Roozenbeek. 2026. “Survey-taking AI tools surpass human abilities. Here’s what we can do about it.” Nature 650 (8101): 293–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-00386-2.

Parashar, Manish, Tess DeBlanc-Knowles, Erwin Gianchandani, and Lynne E. Parker. 2023. “Strengthening and Democratizing Artificial Intelligence Research and Development.” Computer 56 (11): 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2023.3284568.

Parciak, Marcel, Brecht Vandevoort, Frank Neven, Liesbet M. Peeters, and Stijn Vansummeren. 2024. Schema Matching with Large Language Models: An Experimental Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11852.

Pardo-Guerra, Juan Pablo, and Prithviraj Pahwa. 2022. “The Extended Computational Case Method: A Framework for Research Design.” Sociological Methods & Research 51 (4): 1826–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221122616.

Park, Joon Sung, Carolyn Q. Zou, Jonne Kamphorst, et al. 2024. LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2411.10109.

Parthasarathy, Ramya, Vijayendra Rao, and Nethra Palaniswamy. 2019. “Deliberative Democracy in an Unequal World: A Text-As-Data Study of South India’s Village Assemblies.” American Political Science Review 113 (3): 623–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000182.

Patel, Dylan, A. J. Kourabi, Doug O’Laughlin, and Reyk Knuhtsen. 2025. DeepSeek Debates: Chinese Leadership On Cost, True Training Cost, Closed Model Margin Impacts. https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/deepseek-debates.

Patwardhan, Tejal, Rachel Dias, Elizabeth Proehl, et al. 2025. GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Tasks. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.04374.

Peeters, Ralph, Aaron Steiner, and Christian Bizer. 2024. Entity Matching Using Large Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11244.

Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2026. Agentic AI and Social Science Research Practice. Blog post. https://tompepinsky.com/2026/01/23/agentic-ai-and-social-science-research-practice/.

Phan, Long, Alice Gatti, Nathaniel Li, et al. 2026. “A benchmark of expert-level academic questions to assess AI capabilities.” Nature 649 (8099): 1139–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09962-4.

Pichai, Sundar. 2026. “Cloud Next ‘26: Momentum and Innovation at Google Scale.” Google, April 22. https://web.archive.org/web/20260425012108/https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/infrastructure-and-cloud/google-cloud/cloud-next-2026-sundar-pichai/.

Poldrack, Russell. 2025. “AI-assisted Coding: 10 Simple Rules to Maintain Scientific Rigor.” The Transmitter, December 16. https://doi.org/10.53053/LCDN3424.

Politzer-Ahles, Stephen, Teresa Girolamo, and Samantha Ghali. 2020. “Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in academic reviewing.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 47: 100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100895.

Popper, Karl R. 1963. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge; Kegan Paul.

Prallon, Brenda. 2026. How Robust are Robustness Checks? https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19384.

Prather, James, Brent N. Reeves, Juho Leinonen, et al. 2024. “The Widening Gap: The Benefits and Harms of Generative AI for Novice Programmers.” Proceedings of the ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/3632620.3671116.

Regla-Vargas, Alejandra, AJ Alvero, and Hajar Yazdiha. 2026. “Racial framing contests: How anti-Asian racism and its resistance enacted racial projects during COVID-19.” Big Data & Society 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261424160.

Reif, Jessica A., Richard P. Larrick, and Jack B. Soll. 2025. “Evidence of a Social Evaluation Penalty for Using AI.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (19): e2426766122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2426766122.

Requarth, Tim. 2025. “From Bench to Bot: Why AI-powered Writing May Not Deliver on Its Promise.” The Transmitter, September 2. https://doi.org/10.53053/HZQR1694.

Reuben, Ernesto, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales. 2014. “How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (12): 4403–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314788111.

Rilla, Raluca, Tobias Werner, Hiromu Yakura, Iyad Rahwan, and Anne-Marie Nussberger. 2025. Recognising, Anticipating, and Mitigating LLM Pollution of Online Behavioural Research. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01390.

Rivera, Lauren A. 2012. “Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms.” American Sociological Review 77 (6): 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412463213.

Roberts, Margaret E., Brandon M. Stewart, and Dustin Tingley. 2014. “stm: R package for structural topic models.” R package version 0.6.

Roberts, Margaret E., Brandon M. Stewart, Dustin Tingley, Christopher Lucas, et al. 2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1064–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103.

Rodman, Emma. 2020. “A Timely Intervention: Tracking the Changing Meanings of Political Concepts with Word Vectors.” Political Analysis 28 (1): 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.23.

Rogers, Everett M. (1962) 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. Free Press.

Root, William B., and Ruth Anne Rehfeldt. 2021. “Towards a Modern-Day Teaching Machine: The Synthesis of Programmed Instruction and Online Education.” The Psychological Record 71 (1): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00415-0.

Rothschild, David, Jenny Marlar, Ashley Amaya, et al. 2026. “Responsible AI Integration in Survey Research.” American Association for Public Opinion Research, June 25. https://aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Responsible-AI-Integration-In-Survey-Research.pdf.

Rowold, Carla, Emanuela Struffolino, and Anette Eva Fasang. 2025. “Life-Course-Sensitive Analysis of Group Inequalities: Combining Sequence Analysis with the Kitagawa–Oaxaca–Blinder Decomposition.” Sociological Methods & Research 54 (2): 646–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241231224226.

Rozado, David. 2024. “The political preferences of LLMs.” PLOS ONE 19 (7): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306621.

Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. In Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316696.

Russell, Stuart J., and Peter Norvig. 2021. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4th ed. Pearson.

Russo, Giuseppe, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Tim Ruben Davidson, Veniamin Veselovsky, and Robert West. 2025. “The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 9 (7): 1–28.

Ryder, Norman B. 1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American Sociological Review 30 (6): 843. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090964.

Rytting, Christopher Michael, Taylor Sorensen, Lisa P. Argyle, et al. 2023. Towards Coding Social Science Datasets with Language Models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2306.02177.

Salazar-Miranda, Arianna, Zhuangyuan Fan, Michael Baick, et al. 2025. “Exploring the social life of urban spaces through AI.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (30): e2424662122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2424662122.

Salganik, Matthew J. 2019. Bit By Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton University Press.

Salganik, Matthew J., and Karen E. C. Levy. 2015. “Wiki Surveys: Open and Quantifiable Social Data Collection.” PLOS ONE 10 (5): e0123483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123483.

Santurkar, Shibani, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2023. “Whose opinions do language models reflect?” Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA), ICML’23.

Scheidel, Walter. 2024. “Beyond technology and wages: power and the history of inequality.” Oxford Open Economics 3 (Supplement_1): i212–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/ooec/odad010.

Schick, Timo, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, et al. 2023. Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761.

Schmidgall, Samuel, Yusheng Su, Ze Wang, et al. 2025. “Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants.” Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, 5977–6043. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.320.

Serapio-Garcı́a, Greg, Mustafa Safdari, Clément Crepy, et al. 2023. Personality Traits in Large Language Models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2307.00184.

Sewell, William H. 1999. “1. The Concept(s) of Culture.” In Beyond the Cultural Turn. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520922167-003.

Shah, Syed Mehtab Hussain, Frank Hopfgartner, and Arnim Bleier. 2026. Automating Computational Reproducibility in Social Science: Comparing Prompt-Based and Agent-Based Approaches. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.08561.

Shaw, Steven D., and Gideon Nave. 2026. Thinking–Fast, Slow, and Artificial: How AI Is Reshaping Human Reasoning and the Rise of Cognitive Surrender. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yk25n_v1.

Shen, Judy Hanwen, and Alex Tamkin. 2026. How AI Impacts Skill Formation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.20245.

Siebert, Luciano Cavalcante, Maria Luce Lupetti, Evgeni Aizenberg, et al. 2023. “Meaningful Human Control: Actionable Properties for AI System Development.” AI and Ethics 3: 241–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00167-3.

Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn. 2011. “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science 22 (11): 1359–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.

Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative Behavior. Macmillan.

Simonsohn, Uri, Joseph P. Simmons, and Leif D. Nelson. 2020. “Specification Curve Analysis.” Nature Human Behaviour 4 (11): 1208–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z.

Skarpelis, A. K. M. 2026. “From Archives to Algorithms: Distance, Evidence, and Inference.” Sociologica 20 (1): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1971-8853/23642.

Sleegers, Willem, and Jamie Elsey. 2025. Adoption and Uses of LLMs among U.S. Tech Workers. Rethink Priorities. https://rethinkpriorities.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/LLM-industry-survey.pdf.

Smith, Aaron, and Monica Anderson. 2018. Social Media Use in 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/.

Soderstrom, Nicholas C., and Robert A. Bjork. 2015. “Learning versus Performance: An Integrative Review.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 10 (2): 176–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000.

Sparrow, Betsy, Jenny Liu, and Daniel M. Wegner. 2011. “Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips.” Science 333 (6043): 776–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745.

Spector-Bagdady, Kayte. 2025. “The Need for Prospective Integrity Standards for the Use of Generative AI in Research.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 53 (1). https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.41.

Spirling, Arthur. 2023. “Why open-source generative AI models are an ethical way forward for science.” Nature 616: 413. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01295-4.

Spirling, Arthur. 2026. 2025–2026 Talks on Replication, Open Models, and Social-Science Uses of Language Models. Talks at Stanford Political Science and Yale ISPS.

Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. 2026. Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2026. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. https://hai.stanford.edu/assets/files/ai_index_report_2026.pdf.

Steegen, Sara, Francis Tuerlinckx, Andrew Gelman, and Wolf Vanpaemel. 2016. “Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (5): 702–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637.

Stephanopoulos, Nicholas O., and Eric M. McGhee. 2017. “Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap.” The University of Chicago Law Review. https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/partisan-gerrymandering-and-efficiency-gap.

Stewart, Rebecca. 2025. “Hi! It’s Duo: The Marketing Strategy Behind the Internet’s Favorite Green Menace.” Adweek, April 8. https://web.archive.org/web/20250425210150/https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/duolingo-duo-owl-marketing-strategy/.

Steyvers, Mark, Heliodoro Tejeda, Aakriti Kumar, et al. 2025. “What Large Language Models Know and What People Think They Know.” Nature Machine Intelligence 7 (2): 221–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00976-7.

Stockemer, Daniel, Gabriela Galassi, and Engi Abou-El-Kheir. 2026. “A Fresh Look at the Publication and Citation Gap Between Men and Women: Insights from Economics and Political Science.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06786-z.

Stoltz, Dustin S., and Marshall A. Taylor. 2021. “Cultural cartography with word embeddings.” Poetics 88 (October): 101567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101567.

Strauss, Claudia, and Naomi Quinn. 1998. A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge University Press.

Stuhler, Oscar, Cat Dang Ton, and Etienne Ollion. 2025. “From Codebooks to Promptbooks: Extracting Information from Text with Generative Large Language Models.” Sociological Methods & Research 54 (3): 794–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251336794.

Suchman, Lucy. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press.

Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521.

Swidler, Ann. 2005. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. University of Chicago Press.

Tang, Chuang, Shaobo (Kevin) Li, Suming Hu, Fue Zeng, and Qianzhou Du. 2025. “Gender disparities in the impact of generative artificial intelligence: Evidence from academia.” PNAS Nexus 4 (2): pgae591. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae591.

Tankelevitch, Lev, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, et al. 2024. “The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI.” Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642902.

Tarr, Alexander, June Hwang, and Kosuke Imai. 2022. “Automated Coding of Political Campaign Advertisement Videos: An Empirical Validation Study.” Political Analysis 31 (4): 554–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2022.26.

Tetenov, Aleksey. 2016. An Economic Theory of Statistical Testing. CeMMAP Working Paper CWP50/16. Centre for Microdata Methods; Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.cem.2016.5016.

Than, Ker. 2026. “Social Scientists Embrace the AI Moment.” Stanford Report, April 24. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2026/04/ai-social-science-empirical-research.

Thapa, Surendrabikram, Shuvam Shiwakoti, Siddhant Bikram Shah, et al. 2025. “Large Language Models (LLM) in Computational Social Science: Prospects, Current State, and Challenges.” Social Network Analysis and Mining 15 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01428-9.

The Polarization Research Lab. 2026. https://polarizationresearchlab.org/.

Thomas, Kathrin. 2024. “The Advent of Survey Experiments in Politics and International Relations.” Government and Opposition 59 (1): 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.36.

Thomas, Llewellyn D. W., Angelo Kenneth G. Romasanta, and Laia Pujol Priego. 2026. “Jagged Competencies: Measuring the Reliability of Generative AI in Academic Research.” Journal of Business Research 203 (January): 115804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115804.

Thompson, Clive. 2026. “Coding after Coders: The End of Computer Programming as We Know It.” The New York Times Magazine, March 12. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/12/magazine/ai-coding-programming-jobs-claude-chatgpt.html.

Tian, Katherine, Eric Mitchell, Allan Zhou, et al. 2023. “Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedback.” Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 5433–42. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.330.

Tirumala, Shreyas, Nishant Jain, Danny D. Leybzon, and Trent D. Buskirk. 2025. Mic Drop or Data Flop? Evaluating the Fitness for Purpose of AI Voice Interviewers for Data Collection Within Quantitative & Qualitative Research Contexts. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2509.01814.

Tong, Anna, Kenrick Cai, and Krystal Hu. 2025. “Exclusive: Google, Scale AI’s largest customer, plans split after Meta deal, sources say.” Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/google-scale-ais-largest-customer-plans-split-after-meta-deal-sources-say-2025-06-13/.

Topaz, Maxim, Nir Roguin, Pallavi Gupta, Zhihong Zhang, and Laura-Maria Peltonen. 2026. “Fabricated citations: an audit across 2.5 million biomedical papers.” The Lancet 407 (10541): 1779–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00603-3.

Törnberg, Petter. 2024. “Best Practices for Text Annotation with Large Language Models.” Sociologica 18 (2).

Torreblanca, Carolina, William Dinneen, Guy Grossman, and Yiqing Xu. 2025. The Credibility Revolution in Political Science. December. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/w2kmc_v1.

Tourangeau, Roger, and Thomas J. Plewes, eds. 2013. In Nonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering,; Medicine. https://doi.org/10.17226/18293.

Tsvetkova, Milena, Ruth Garcı́a-Gavilanes, Luciano Floridi, and Taha Yasseri. 2017. “Even good bots fight: The case of Wikipedia.” PLOS ONE 12 (2): e0171774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171774.

Tsvetkova, Milena, Taha Yasseri, Niccolo Pescetelli, and Tobias Werner. 2024. “A New Sociology of Humans and Machines.” Nature Human Behaviour 8 (10): 1864–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02001-8.

Turing, Alan. 1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 59 (236): 433–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433.

Turkle, Sherry. 2013. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.

Turpin, Miles, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2023. Language Models Don’t Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04388.

Twyman, Janet S. 2020. “Programmed Instruction.” In The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, edited by Stephen Hupp and Jeremy Jewell. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad095.

Underwood, Ted, Laura K. Nelson, and Matthew Wilkens. 2025. Can Language Models Represent the Past without Anachronism? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2505.00030.

Uprichard, Emma, Roger Burrows, and David Byrne. 2008. “SPSS as an ’Inscription Device’: From Causality to Description?” The Sociological Review 56 (4): 606–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2008.00807.x.

van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M., and Ellen J. Helsper. 2015. “The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?” In Communication and Information Technologies Annual. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2050-206020150000010002.

van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M., and Jan van Dijk. 2019. “The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access.” New Media & Society 21 (2): 354–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082.

van Loon, Austin, Salvatore Giorgi, Robb Willer, and Johannes Eichstaedt. 2022. “Negative Associations in Word Embeddings Predict Anti-black Bias across Regions–but Only via Name Frequency.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 16 (May): 1419–24. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19399.

Van Noorden, Richard, and Jeffrey M. Perkel. 2023. “AI and science: what 1,600 researchers think.” Nature 621 (7980): 672–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02980-0.

Varnum, Michael E. W., Nicolas Baumard, Mohammad Atari, and Kurt Gray. 2024. “Large Language Models based on historical text could offer informative tools for behavioral science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (42). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2407639121.

Vaswani, Ashish, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, et al. 2017. Attention Is All You Need. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1706.03762.

Velez, Yamil R., Donald P. Green, and Semra Sevi. 2025. “Chatbot Voting Advice Applications inform but seldom sway young unaligned voters.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (50): e2515516122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2515516122.

Vendraminelli, Luca, Matthew DosSantos DiSorbo, Annika Hildebrandt, Edward McFowland III, Arvind Karunakaran, and Iavor Bojinov. 2025. The GenAI Wall Effect: Examining the Limits to Horizontal Expertise Transfer Between Occupational Insiders and Outsiders. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5462694.

Verga, Pat, Sebastian Hofstatter, Sophia Althammer, et al. 2024. Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18796.

Vernon, Vaughn. 2013. Implementing Domain-Driven Design. Addison-Wesley.

Villalobos, Pablo, Anson Ho, Jaime Sevilla, Tamay Besiroglu, Lennart Heim, and Marius Hobbhahn. 2024. “Position: Will We Run Out of Data? Limits of LLM Scaling Based on Human-Generated Data.” In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, edited by Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Zico Kolter, Katherine Heller, et al., vol. 235. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/villalobos24a.html.

Voelkel, Jan G., Michael N. Stagnaro, James Y. Chu, et al. 2024. “Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity.” Science 386 (6719): eadh4764. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4764.

von der Heyde, Leah, Anna-Carolina Haensch, Bernd Weiß, and Jessica Daikeler. 2025. “Using Large Language Models for Coding German Open-Ended Survey Responses on Survey Motivation.” Survey Research Methods 19: 355–70. https://doi.org/10.18148/SRM/2025.V19I4.8568.

von der Heyde, Leah, Florian Keusch, Trent D. Buskirk, and Adam Eck. 2026. AI in the Loop?! A Systematic Review of the Use of Large Language Models in Survey and Public Opinion Research. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/eubj4_v1.

Voteview. 2026. https://voteview.com/.

Voyer, Andrea, Zachary D. Kline, and Madison Danton. 2022. “Symbols of class: A computational analysis of class distinction-making through etiquette, 1922-2017.” Poetics 94 (October): 101734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101734.

Wagner, Michael W. 2023. “Independence by Permission.” Science 381 (6656): 388–91. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi2430.

Wald, Abraham. 1950. Statistical Decision Functions. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books?id=nq0gAAAAMAAJ.

Wallace, David Foster. 2009. This Is Water: Some Thoughts, Delivered on a Significant Occasion about Living a Compassionate Life. Little, Brown.

Wallace, Michael, and Arne L. Kalleberg. 1982. “Industrial Transformation and the Decline of Craft: The Decomposition of Skill in the Printing Industry, 1931-1978.” American Sociological Review 47 (3): 307. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094988.

Wang, Chenglong, Haoyu Tang, Xiyuan Yang, et al. 2025. “Uncovering inequalities in new knowledge learning by large language models across different languages.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (51). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2514626122.

Watters, Audrey. 2021. Teaching Machines: The History of Personalized Learning. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12262.001.0001.

Webb, Beatrice. 1926. My Apprenticeship. Longmans, Green; Co.

Webb, Taylor, Keith J. Holyoak, and Hongjing Lu. 2023. “Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models.” Nature Human Behaviour 7 (9): 1526–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01659-w.

Wenger, Emily, and Yoed N. Kenett. 2026. “Large language models are homogeneously creative.” PNAS Nexus 5 (3): pgag042. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag042.

Westwood, Sean J. 2025. “The potential existential threat of large language models to online survey research.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (47). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2518075122.

Westwood, Sean J., and Samuel Frederick. 2026. “Reply to Van der Stigchel et al.: Empirical evidence that AI survey contamination is real and substantial.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123 (8). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2537420123.

White, Halbert. 2000. “A Reality Check for Data Snooping.” Econometrica 68 (5): 1097–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00152.

Wiley. 2025. AI Adoption Jumps to 84% among Researchers as Expectations Undergo Significant Reality Check. Press release. https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/AI-Adoption-Jumps-to-84-Among-Researchers-as-Expectations-Undergo-Significant-Reality-Check/default.aspx.

Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford University Press.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishers.

Wu, Patrick Y. 2026. “Beyond Price: A Technical Quality Framework for AI Antitrust.” Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’26, 4102–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3805689.3812338.

Wu, Patrick Y., Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker, and Solomon Messing. 2023. Large Language Models Can Be Used to Estimate the Latent Positions of Politicians. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12057.

Xiao, Tianqi, Francesco Fuso Nerini, H. Damon Matthews, Massimo Tavoni, and Fengqi You. 2025. “Environmental Impact and Net-Zero Pathways for Sustainable Artificial Intelligence Servers in the USA.” Nature Sustainability 8: 1541–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01681-y.

Xie, Yueqi, Lemeng Liang, Shuzhen Li, et al. 2026. “Evaluating the Statistical Realism of LLM-Generated Social Science Data.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123 (19). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2538145123.

Xiong, Miao, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, et al. 2024. Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2306.13063.

Xu, Haotian, and Wenqin Shen. 2026. “From tool to partner: generative AI usage patterns and research performance among doctoral students.” Studies in Higher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2026.2625386.

Xu, Ruoxi, Yingfei Sun, Mengjie Ren, et al. 2024. “AI for Social Science and Social Science of AI: A Survey.” Information Processing & Management 61 (3): 103665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103665.

Xu, Yiqing, and Leo Yang Yang. 2026. Scaling Reproducibility: An AI-Assisted Workflow for Large-Scale Replication and Reanalysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16733.

Yang, Chuanpeng, Yao Zhu, Wang Lu, et al. 2025. “Survey on Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models: Methods, Evaluation, and Application.” ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (New York, NY, USA) 16 (6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3699518.

Yang, Daniel, Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai, and Makoto Yamada. 2024. On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2412.14737.

Yu, Jiachen, Shaoning Sun, Xiaohui Hu, Jiaxu Yan, Kaidong Yu, and Xuelong Li. 2025. “Improve LLM-as-a-Judge Ability as a General Ability.” In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, edited by Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and Violet Peng. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.712.

Zeff, Maxwell. 2026. “How Claude Code Is Reshaping Software–and Anthropic.” Wired, January 22. https://www.wired.com/story/claude-code-success-anthropic-business-model/.

Zhang, Jiaxing, and Shuaishuai Feng. 2021. “Machine learning modeling: A new way to do quantitative research in social sciences in the era of AI.” Journal of Web Engineering 20 (2): 281–302. https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2023.

Zhang, Simone, Janet Xu, and A. J. Alvero. 2025. “Generative AI Meets Open-Ended Survey Responses: Research Participant Use of AI and Homogenization.” Sociological Methods & Research 54 (3): 1197–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251327130.

Zhang, Yanzhao, Mingxin Li, Dingkun Long, et al. 2025. Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05176.

Zhang, Yongjun. 2025. Generative AI has lowered the barriers to computational social sciences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10833.

Zhang, Yongjun. 2026. Vibe Researching as Wolf Coming: Can AI Agents with Skills Replace or Augment Social Scientists? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2602.22401.

Zhao, Zhenyue, Yihe Wang, Toby Stuart, Mathijs De Vaan, Paul Ginsparg, and Yian Yin. 2026. LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07723.

Zheng, Lianmin, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, et al. 2024. “Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-bench and Chatbot Arena.” Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Red Hook, NY, USA), NIPS ’23.

Zhou, Naitian, David Bamman, and Isaac L. Bleaman. 2025. “Culture is Not Trivia: Sociocultural Theory for Cultural NLP.” Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 25869–86. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1256.

Zhou, Shuyan, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, et al. 2024. WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13854.

Zhou, Xuhui, Hao Zhu, Leena Mathur, et al. 2024. SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11667.

Zhuo, Jingming, Songyang Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Haodong Duan, Dahua Lin, and Kai Chen. 2024. “ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs.” Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, November. https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-emnlp.108/.

Ziems, Caleb, William Held, Omar Shaikh, Jiaao Chen, Zhehao Zhang, and Diyi Yang. 2024. “Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?” Computational Linguistics (Cambridge, MA) 50 (1): 237–91. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00502.